Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:50 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/22/11 5:08 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>> Hello Steve and Jack,
>> You need to handle the SIOCSIFADDR ioctl or it gets passed up the stack to
>> ether_ioctl(). When it goes up the interface gets reset. See the comments
>> in em_ioctl() an
Greetings,
I've been trying to figure an ideal solution to this for some time,
and thought I'd post the question here to see if anyone else is working
with this situation.
Here's my scenario;
I have a /24 with a prefix of 168.103.150.xxx with a gateway on this prefix
(DSLmodem).
I also have a /24
On Apr 25, 2011, at 11:47 AM, fbsdm...@dnswatch.com wrote:
> I have a /24 with a prefix of 168.103.150.xxx with a gateway on this prefix
> (DSLmodem).
> I also have a /24 with a prefix of 75.160.109.xxx
> My question(s) is/are:
> 1) is it possible to route both of these across the same GW?
If thes
On 4/25/11 11:47 AM, fbsdm...@dnswatch.com wrote:
Greetings,
I've been trying to figure an ideal solution to this for some time,
and thought I'd post the question here to see if anyone else is working
with this situation.
Here's my scenario;
I have a /24 with a prefix of 168.103.150.xxx with a
On Mon, April 25, 2011 11:54 am, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2011, at 11:47 AM, fbsdm...@dnswatch.com wrote:
>
>> I have a /24 with a prefix of 168.103.150.xxx with a gateway on this
>> prefix (DSLmodem).
>> I also have a /24 with a prefix of 75.160.109.xxx
>> My question(s) is/are:
>> 1) is
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of fbsdm...@dnswatch.com
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:09 PM
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: two /24's and only one gateway - is routing still possible?
>
>
> On
On Mon, April 25, 2011 12:11 pm, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/25/11 11:47 AM, fbsdm...@dnswatch.com wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>> I've been trying to figure an ideal solution to this for some time,
>> and thought I'd post the question here to see if anyone else is working
>> with this situation. Here
