Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On Saturday, March 26, 2011 10:02:12 am Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 16:40 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Reading some more. I'm trying to understand the breakage in your case.
> >
> > You are saying that FreeBSD is the sender, who has data to send, yet is not
On Monday, March 28, 2011 10:21:00 am John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, March 26, 2011 10:02:12 am Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 16:40 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Reading some more. I'm trying to understand the breakage in your case.
> > >
> > > You
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 14:23 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> No, this is not really right. Your patch from your blog is the best
> fix actually. The reason we want to let 'win' be larger than
> TCP_MAXWIN is that if the remote end sends more data than we've
> advertised but we have room in
Le 23/03/2011 à 23:29:16-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit
> >>
> > No.
> >
> > The mount is on the host.
>
> so then I too am not sure why the mount itself would use the second FIB.
> is it possible that some of the mounting is being done automatically
> by rc scripts
> using /etc/fstab in the jai
