On Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:02:35 pm Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just subscribed to this list, so sorry if I missed some previous
> discussion on this.
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 16:15 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> [...]
> > Otherwise, something like this may ap
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:25 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Ah, ok. Can you try this patch first (without the other)? If it doesn't
> work then we can refine the patch above further.
I tried it completely unpatched and with your new patch. In both cases
that if() statement is not taken.
In
On Friday, March 25, 2011 3:41:09 pm Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:25 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Ah, ok. Can you try this patch first (without the other)? If it doesn't
> > work then we can refine the patch above further.
>
> I tried it completely unpatched a
On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:54:33 am Jim wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am not sure if anybody has asked it before. I could not find answer by
> doing rough search on Internet, if it is duplicate question, sorry in
> advance.
>
> My question is that, for getting socket options in tcp_ctloutput() in
On 25 Mar 2011, at 21:01, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:54:33 am Jim wrote:
>> I am not sure if anybody has asked it before. I could not find answer by
>> doing rough search on Internet, if it is duplicate question, sorry in
>> advance.
>>
>> My question is that, for get
[ Please keep me CC'ed ]
Hello. It looks like I'm running in to kern/155772. The ticket was sparse on
details so here's how to reproduce the problem:
I have two routers using openospfd && bgpd:
br1 <-- igb0 -> br2
| |
| igb1 | igb1
| |
+-
