On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>
> I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
> in the TX path. I
Hello, Steven.
You wrote 5 марта 2011 г., 3:06:32:
> Silly question but have you checked your ram for issues, we had a machine
> with seemingly unexplained problems and hangs and it turned out to be
> a duff stick of ram which wasn't being chip killed.
Yes, two full days (48h) of memtest86+ -- n
Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything!
Adrian
On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael wrote:
> On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD
The following reply was made to PR kern/155177; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Luiz Otavio O Souza
To: Eduardo Schoedler
Cc: ,
freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/155177: [route] [panic] Panic when inject routes in kernel
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:18:56 -0300
--Apple-Mail-135-10488728
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>
> I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
> in the TX path. It's quite pos
On Mar 4, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've found another (easy) way to reproduce the problem with two scripts:
> routes-add.sh and routes-remove.sh.
> First run routes-add.sh for a while; then execute routes-remove.sh.
> Cancel with CTRL+C and execute routes-remove.sh a
On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything!
>
> Adrian
>
> On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael wrote:
>
> > On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > For those of you who are test
Hi,
I would like to know what is the differents between ip4 and ip6 for this
command.
First:
#ifconfig lo1
lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
options=3
inet xx.xx.xx.2 netmask 0x
inet6 2a03:::::xx02 prefixlen 128
nd6 options=3
$ ping xx.
On 5 March 2011 21:43, fredrik danerklint wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know what is the differents between ip4 and ip6 for this
> command.
>
> First:
>
> #ifconfig lo1
> lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> options=3
> inet xx.xx.xx.2 netmask 0x
> inet6 2a03::x
On 03/04/2011 16:21, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
That said I messed with the patch to avoid the two copies of the
algorithms (so it will not be 4 soon). I know it compiles but I have
yet to test it. I'd love to hear opinions. The #ifdef INET6/INETs
are ugly but we'll see those a lot more and need to
What was the previous performance? And which chipsets?
Adrian
On 6 March 2011 00:30, Urankar Mikael wrote:
> On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything!
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael >wrote:
Old Synopsis: vr0 without mac address
New Synopsis: [vr] vr0 without mac address
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 5 22:11:07 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reclassify.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.c
Synopsis: [vr] vr0 without mac address
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 5 23:56:00 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
Would you show me full dmesg(8) output of your box?
vr(4) was not touched for a long time so what is the last known
FreeBSD rel
13 matches
Mail list logo
