Re: kern/155177: [route] [panic] Panic when inject routes in kernel

2011-03-04 Thread Eduardo Schoedler
Hello, I've found another (easy) way to reproduce the problem with two scripts: routes-add.sh and routes-remove.sh. First run routes-add.sh for a while; then execute routes-remove.sh. Cancel with CTRL+C and execute routes-remove.sh again. Scripts: # cat routes-add.sh #!/usr/local/bin/b

Re: kern/155177: [route] [panic] Panic when inject routes in kernel

2011-03-04 Thread Eduardo Schoedler
The following reply was made to PR kern/155177; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Eduardo Schoedler" To: Cc: , Subject: Re: kern/155177: [route] [panic] Panic when inject routes in kernel Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:10:00 -0300 Hello, I've found another (easy) way to reproduce the pr

Re: em0 with latest driver hangs again and again (without "Watchdogtimeout" message!)

2011-03-04 Thread Steven Hartland
Silly question but have you checked your ram for issues, we had a machine with seemingly unexplained problems and hangs and it turned out to be a duff stick of ram which wasn't being chip killed. - Original Message - From: "Lev Serebryakov" To: "Brandon Gooch" Cc: "Arnaud Lacombe" ; ;

Re: Proposed patch for Port Randomization modifications according to RFC6056

2011-03-04 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/27/2011 12:23, Fernando Gont wrote: On 08/02/2011 03:47 p.m., Doug Barton wrote: [catching up with e-mail] I've been up and running on this patch vs. r218391 for over 24 hours now, using algorithm 4 (as someone said is now the default in Linux) w

Re: Proposed patch for Port Randomization modifications according to RFC6056

2011-03-04 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/04/2011 16:21, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Doug Barton wrote: As for default algorithm, is there any reason not to make it 4? Yes, it's expensive both computation time and stack wise. Last I put MD5ctxs on the stack I was told that it was previously avoided do to stack l