Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2011-02-28 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: ipfw nat and dual-homed box

2011-02-28 Thread Julian Elischer
On 2/27/11 3:29 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On 27.02.2011 17:08, Eugene Grosbein wrote: [skip] For performance reasons, I need to create similar setup using in-kernel "ipfw nat" what does not have such "multiple instances" feature but has its own "keep-state" mechanics: To correct myself: of

Re: ipfw nat and dual-homed box

2011-02-28 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 28.02.2011 22:44, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 2/27/11 3:29 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> On 27.02.2011 17:08, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> >> [skip] >> >>> For performance reasons, I need to create similar setup using in-kernel >>> "ipfw nat" >>> what does not have such "multiple instances" featur

Re: ipfw nat and dual-homed box

2011-02-28 Thread Julian Elischer
On 2/28/11 8:53 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On 28.02.2011 22:44, Julian Elischer wrote: On 2/27/11 3:29 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On 27.02.2011 17:08, Eugene Grosbein wrote: [skip] For performance reasons, I need to create similar setup using in-kernel "ipfw nat" what does not have such "mu

Re: seeking recommendation: 1000Base-SX PCI NIC for FreeBSD 8

2011-02-28 Thread Jay Borkenhagen
Jay Borkenhagen writes: > Hi, > > After having been disappointed by one vendor *, I am returning to this > list to seek recommendations for 1000Base-SX PCI NICs. I am looking > to run them on FreeBSD 8 and beyond, and I need support for MTU > 1500 > bytes (initially around 4470, but possibl

any is vfs.nfsrv.nfs_privport=0 by default

2011-02-28 Thread Brooks Davis
vfs.nfsrv.nfs_privport controls wither or not NFS enforces the traditional RPC semantics that require that requests come from "privileged" ports. By default this check is disabled. Hardening guides typically suggest this be enabled, usually via the rc.conf knob nfs_reserved_port_only=YES. I'm tr

rtadvd and carp

2011-02-28 Thread User Red35
I am getting started with IPv6 and I am trying to get rtadvd working on the carp interface but it is not working so far. ### I have carp failover between two firewalls. The default gateway for ###hosts internal to the firewall is 172.31.98.103 for IPv4 ###and 2001:470:dead:98::103 for

FreeBSD TDMA kernel PANIC

2011-02-28 Thread Kyungsoo Lee
Hi, whenever I try to set my mini PCI-e card (Anatel AR5BXB6) as Master (tdmaslot 0), kernel shows PANIC msg like the below. It's OK when I set the card as not Master like tdmalsot 1,2, and more. What is the problem? And how can I fix it? Interestingly, the kernel PANIC occurs when I use this car

Interface descriptions via pcap broken

2011-02-28 Thread Bruce Cran
I installed wireshark on my 9-CURRENT machine yesterday and found that the interface description fields are all set to 0xa5. From reading the code it looks like the data is being fetched via pcap. Device: usbus1 Description: \xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5 \xa5\xa5\xa5\xa5

Re: FreeBSD TDMA kernel PANIC

2011-02-28 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Tuesday, March 01, 2011 03:49:41 Kyungsoo Lee wrote: > Hi, > > whenever I try to set my mini PCI-e card (Anatel AR5BXB6) as Master > (tdmaslot 0), kernel shows PANIC msg like the below. > It's OK when I set the card as not Master like tdmalsot 1,2, and more. What > is the problem? And how can I

Re: rtadvd and carp

2011-02-28 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 1 March 2011 02:28, User Red35 wrote: > > I am getting started with IPv6 and I am trying to get rtadvd working on > the carp interface but it is not working so far. > > > ### I have carp failover between two firewalls.  The default gateway for > ###    hosts internal to the firewall is 172.31.9