Re: CARP Failover

2011-02-02 Thread Mike Barnard
sorry for the delay in responding. The two firewalls cannot hear each other's CARP announcements. Test > with tcpdump; do you see the CARP packets coming from the other > firewall? If not, you have a switching problem, like the two firewalls > are not in the same VLAN together. > > that there wa

Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM

2011-02-02 Thread Jack Vogel
So has everyone that wanted to get something testing been able to do so? Jack On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 2/1/2011 5:03 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:43 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> To those who are going to test, here is the if_em.c, based on

Re: A flood of bacula traffic causes igb interface to go offline.

2011-02-02 Thread Sean Bruno
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 12:50 -0800, Mike Carlson wrote: > Hey net@, > > I have a FreeBSD 8.2-RC2 system running on a HP DL180 G6, using the > onboard Intel controller, and it is our primary Bacula storage node and > director node. > > We have 96 clients that are scheduled to run at 8:30pm. After

Re: A flood of bacula traffic causes igb interface to go offline.

2011-02-02 Thread Mike Carlson
On 02/02/2011 10:07 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 12:50 -0800, Mike Carlson wrote: Hey net@, I have a FreeBSD 8.2-RC2 system running on a HP DL180 G6, using the onboard Intel controller, and it is our primary Bacula storage node and director node. We have 96 clients that are sche

Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM

2011-02-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 2/2/2011 12:37 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > So has everyone that wanted to get something testing been able to do so? I have been testing in the back and will deploy to my production box this afternoon. As I am not able to reproduce it easily, it will be a bit before I can say the issue is gone. J

Re: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load

2011-02-02 Thread Mark Boolootian
The following reply was made to PR kern/146792; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Boolootian To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, n...@gtelecom.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:37:16 -0800 --00163630f77dc34e0d049b51c661 Cont

Re: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load

2011-02-02 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
The following reply was made to PR kern/146792; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, n...@gtelecom.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/146792: [flowtable] flowcleaner 100% cpu's core load Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:36:04 + (UTC) Hi, things could be improv

IPFW extension for traffic classification based on statistical properties

2011-02-02 Thread Sebastian Zander
Hi all, We believe this may be of some interest to list members, and apologise in advance for any duplicates you may receive. We are pleased to announce DIFFUSE v0.2, our second release of a system enabling FreeBSD's IPFW firewall subsystem to classify IP traffic based on statistical traffic pro

About "panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy???"

2011-02-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 02.02.2011 00:50, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > E> Uptime: 8h3m51s > E> Dumping 4087 MB (3 chunks) > E> chunk 0: 1MB (150 pages) ... ok > E> chunk 1: 3575MB (915088 pages) 3559 3543panic: bufwrite: buffer is not > busy??? > E> cpuid = 3 > E> Uptime: 8h3m52s > E> Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - p