Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
The following reply was made to PR kern/92880; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrey Simonenko
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3)
function
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:56:25 +0200
Since all '=' were changed to '=3D' in pr
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
EG>I run 8.2-PRERELEASE with bsnmpd and mpd55 serving PPPoE users.
EG>I've noticed that sometimes snmpwalk shows interface indexes
EG>that partially differ from what if_nametoindex(3) returns
EG>with off-by-one or off-by-two. For example, just now this s
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
EG>bsnmpd running with mibII module opens local socket /var/run/snmpd.sock
EG>mentioned in snmp_mibII(3) manual page:
EG>
EG> The mibII module opens a socket that is used to execute all network
EG> related ioctl(2) functions. This socket is glob
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
EG>On 23.01.2011 00:24, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
EG>> I really need quick method to obtain SNMP index within mpd55 code
EG>> (for my local mpd hacks) and if_nametoindex() used to seem nice way...
EG>> I need to export indexes via mpd's web interface so tha
The following reply was made to PR kern/154214; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: freebsd-am...@freebsd.org
Cc: "Vladislav V. Prodan" ,
freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amd64/154214: Panic when creating stf interface
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:11:31 -0500
On Friday
24.01.2011 17:10, John Baldwin wrote:
> The picture shows a double fault (likely due to infinite recursion on the
> stack or some code putting too large of an object onto the stack). Can you
> get a backtrace via 'tr' at the db> prompt and reply with the output?
Following the withdrawal of th
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> It's likely that the mbuf handling problem (in em_refresh_mbufs()) is
>> triggered by the processing you're doing with ipfw (or elsewhere for
>> that matter), so, yes, I think it's a bug fixed in the
Just replying so you know I'm seeing it, but something that takes 14 days to
even happen
is NOT going to be an easy one to find. As Brandon said, all the info you
can provide please.
Jack
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
Hi all,
We have ported nfe driver to our product and when we try to set mtu to 9000 on
nfe interface, it does not work. No jumbo frame buffer were allocated. Looking
at the code, we found the following:
In nfe_ioctl:
else {
NFE_LOCK(sc);
ifp->if_mtu = if
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:05:48AM -0800, Huang, Yusheng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have ported nfe driver to our product and when we try to set mtu to 9000
> on nfe interface, it does not work. No jumbo frame buffer were allocated.
> Looking at the code, we found the following:
>
> In nfe_ioctl:
On 24.01.2011 19:30, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> EG>On 23.01.2011 00:24, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> EG>> I really need quick method to obtain SNMP index within mpd55 code
> EG>> (for my local mpd hacks) and if_nametoindex() used to seem nice way...
> EG>> I
> Just replying so you know I'm seeing it, but something that takes 14 days to
> even happen
> is NOT going to be an easy one to find. As Brandon said, all the info you
> can provide please.
Here's the dump in case you've not seen it before. Somehow 8.1-RELEASE
managed to make a proper dump, which
13 matches
Mail list logo
