Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM

2011-01-21 Thread Jan Koum
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/24/2010 5:44 PM, Jan Koum wrote: > > hi Ivan and Mike, > > > > wanted to follow up and see if you found a solid long-term solution to > this > > bug. we are still seeing this problem in our 8.2 environment with ASPM > > already disabled.

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-21 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
Hi all, the same problem i wrote in the first posts about year ago :( onboard re(4) tremendous flapping while ( cable connects nic and switch ) { re0: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN } here the details: dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK

Re: [patch] re(4) problems on networks with disabled autonegotiation "solver" (WAS: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to...) -- REQUEST FOR REVIEW

2011-01-21 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:42:47PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:41:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Hello, Marius. > > You wrote 14 ?? 2011 ?., 4:24:12: > > > > > found by ignoring the bits set in the "don't care mask". I've > > > updated the patch at the abov

Re: [patch] re(4) problems on networks with disabled autonegotiation "solver" (WAS: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to...) -- REQUEST FOR REVIEW

2011-01-21 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Marius. You wrote 21 января 2011 г., 17:16:20: >> > > found by ignoring the bits set in the "don't care mask". I've >> > > updated the patch at the above URL accordingly and based on my >> > > testing it now should actually work as expected. Sorry for the >> > > glitch. >> > Yes, it works

Re: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function

2011-01-21 Thread Andrey Simonenko
The following reply was made to PR kern/92880; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrey Simonenko To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:12:49 +0200 My previous modification had one typo and

Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic

2011-01-21 Thread Juergen Lock
The following reply was made to PR kern/153938; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Juergen Lock To: PseudoCylon Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:21:20 +0100 On Thu, Jan 20,

Re: bogus 0 len IP packet, was: Hang in VOP_LOCK1_APV on 8-STABLE with NFS.

2011-01-21 Thread Ronald Klop
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:38:04 +0100, wrote: > So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to 0 > for these TCP/IP packets? > > Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think of is > that he could try disabling TSO, etc?) > > Thanks in advance for any