Re: igb watchdog timeouts

2011-01-14 Thread sthaug
> > They have enough buffers (128 for each of tx and rx IIRC). The only thing > > polling mode gave for them was lower latency, but this cost enabling > > polling in the idle loop, which wastes 100% of at least 1 CPU and some > > power. Without polling in idle, polling gives very high latency (ev

Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-14 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
Hello, I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms and runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. I'm experiencing stability issues related to Netgraph. None of above routers can survive more than 20-30 days o

Re: igb watchdog timeouts

2011-01-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 sth...@nethelp.no wrote: They have enough buffers (128 for each of tx and rx IIRC). The only thing polling mode gave for them was lower latency, but this cost enabling polling in the idle loop, which wastes 100% of at least 1 CPU and some power. Without polling in idle, pol

Re: igb watchdog timeouts

2011-01-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Jan 13, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: To quote an earlier post: "Polling mode operation generally performs better when using older 100Mbs ethernet NICs which do not support interrupt mitigation and various capabilities like TSO4; gigabit eth

Re: [patch] re(4) problems on networks with disabled autonegotiation "solver" (WAS: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to...) -- REQUEST FOR REVIEW

2011-01-14 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Marius. You wrote 14 января 2011 г., 4:24:12: > found by ignoring the bits set in the "don't care mask". I've > updated the patch at the above URL accordingly and based on my > testing it now should actually work as expected. Sorry for the > glitch. Yes, it works for me. Only one note:

Re: igb watchdog timeouts

2011-01-14 Thread sthaug
> > I have a couple of servers with Broadcom (bge) GigE interfaces. These > > servers became completely unresponsive/unusable at high network traffic > > (presumably due to the interrupt processing) but were able to handle the > > same traffic with no problems after switching to polling. This was i

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-14 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/14/2011 4:05 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE > concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms > and > runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. > > I'm experiencing stability issues related to

Re: kern/138666: [multicast] [panic] not working multicast through igmpproxy

2011-01-14 Thread Florian Smeets
On 31.12.10 17:09, Florian Smeets wrote: > On 31.12.10 16:38, Kevin Lo wrote: >> This issue is easily reproduced on 9.0 -CURRENT as well. >> I got kernel panic after running mrouted, igmpproxy, or xorp. > > My router is still running r215262 from mid November, without problems > when watching IPTV

Added AI_V4MAPPED and AI_ALL to getaddrinfo.c

2011-01-14 Thread Philip Homburg
Hi, I'm using FreeBSD library code for some other project and I needed AI_V4MAPPED and AI_ALL for getaddrinfo. So I wrote some code to support these features. Is anybody interested in this? I can give you patch to an older version of getaddrinfo.c. It needs some work, in particular restoring some

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-14 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 14.01.2011 18:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE >> concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms >> and >> runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. >> >> I'm experiencing stability issues related to Netgraph. None

Looking for hints re 802.1X wired

2011-01-14 Thread Dennis Glatting
I am trouble with 802.1x wired and I am wondering whether there is some required characteristic of the Ethernet driver. AFAICT, I have my wap_supplicant running correctly and I do have wireless interfaces that work both AP and supplicant. My Ethernet is: Bart# dmesg|grep em0 em0: port 0x4

Looking for hints re 802.1X wired (fwd)

2011-01-14 Thread Dennis Glatting
I forgot to mention an important data point. I see via WireShark the EAPOL from the supplicant to the server and the server requesting identity but the supplicant doesn't appear to see the request. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:34:27 -0700 (MST) From: Denn

Re: Looking for hints re 802.1X wired (fwd)

2011-01-14 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Friday 14 January 2011 15:40:18 Dennis Glatting wrote: > I forgot to mention an important data point. I see via WireShark the > EAPOL from the supplicant to the server and the server requesting > identity but the supplicant doesn't appear to see the request. Which FreeBSD version are you runnin

Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic

2011-01-14 Thread Juergen Lock
The following reply was made to PR kern/153938; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Juergen Lock To: PseudoCylon Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:36:50 +0100 On Thu

panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy???

2011-01-14 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 14.01.2011 18:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE >> concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms >> and >> runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. >> >> I'm experiencing stability issues related to Netgraph. None

Re: panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy???

2011-01-14 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, January 14, 2011 1:44:19 pm Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 14.01.2011 18:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >> I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE > >> concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware > >> platforms and > >> runs FreeBSD 7.3-R

Re: Looking for hints re 802.1X wired (fwd)

2011-01-14 Thread Dennis Glatting
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: On Friday 14 January 2011 15:40:18 Dennis Glatting wrote: I forgot to mention an important data point. I see via WireShark the EAPOL from the supplicant to the server and the server requesting identity but the supplicant doesn't appear to see the r

[OT] Re: igb watchdog timeouts

2011-01-14 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:12 AM, Bruce Evans wrote: >> On a good day, my MUA sends "Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed" and >> should contain line breaks following the 80-character-per-line Usenet >> conventions, which modern MUAs might well reassemble based upon the user's >> window size. If i

Re: igb watchdog timeouts

2011-01-14 Thread Charles Owens
Thanks for all the feedback on polling, Jack and others. Very helpful. We are working to merge the latest RELENG_8 em/igb driver into our custom build that's based on RELENG_8_1. I've been able to create a patch using the following command: cvs di -N -up -jRELENG_8_1 -jRELENG_8 sys/dev/e100

Re: [OT] Re: igb watchdog timeouts

2011-01-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Jan 14, 2011, at 2:12 AM, Bruce Evans wrote: On a good day, my MUA sends "Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed" and should contain line breaks following the 80-character-per-line Usenet conventions, which modern MUAs might well reassemble based u