Hi, all experts: I find a suspect point in function
of sctp_process_a_data_chunk in all FreeBSD branches.for example:Line 1900 of
sctp_indata: (asoc->strmin[strmno].last_sequence_delivered + 1) == strmseqThis
is a logical judgement sentence.last_sequence_delivered is unsigned short type,
str
On Dec 15, 2010, at 8:46 AM, 罗钰 wrote:
> Hi, all experts:I find a suspect point in function of
> sctp_process_a_data_chunk in all FreeBSD branches.for example:Line 1900 of
> sctp_indata: (asoc->strmin[strmno].last_sequence_delivered + 1) ==
> strmseqThis is a logical judgement sentence.last
Hi!
Yes, I have PF enabled with some NAT rules present in the rule set. However
disabling PF (even by commenting out 'pf_enable' in the /etc/rc.conf and
rebooting the machine) does not make any difference. The problem persist
regardless of whether NAT is enabled or not (or even whether pf.ko is lo
On 13 Dec, 2010, at 13:21 , Nikolay Denev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently trying to enable bsnmpd to export the interface
> descriptions that are supported on FreeBSD 8+ as ifDescr and
> while doing it I'm wondering if RTM_IFINFO msgs should be generated
> on description set/change. This would
Hello,
i just discovered it seems to be impossible to force a duplex setting if the
switchport is not doing autonegotiation.
The server in question has a Realtek 1GBit device but the hosting company
reduces the speed on their switches to 100MBit. So after booting without
any options this gives m
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
In reply to the original post:
Dear all:
When the new link layer framework was introduced in 8.0, one of our ATM
stacks, netnatm, was left behind. As a result, it neither compiles nor runs
in 8.x and 9.x. This e-mail serves two purposes:
(1) To s
