On Monday, December 06, 2010 8:18:07 pm Mihai-Catalin Salgau wrote:
> Hello Freebsd-net,
>
> I have two dual port NICs, one Broadcom(bce0,bce1) and one Intel(em0,em1),
> on FreeBSD 8-stable
> (about two weeks old) with a DHCP server running.
> I've been successfully using a large number of
Same thing I was thinking, there is nothing else that should limit vlans in
any way.
Jack
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, December 06, 2010 8:18:07 pm Mihai-Catalin Salgau wrote:
> > Hello Freebsd-net,
> >
> > I have two dual port NICs, one Broadcom(bce0,bce1
Hello Jack,
Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 7:46:32 PM, you wrote:
> Same thing I was thinking, there is nothing else that should limit vlans in
> any way.
> Jack
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, December 06, 2010 8:18:07 pm Mihai-Catalin Salgau wrote:
>> > Hell
HMM, well this has a certain amount of deja vu to it :) There was a
problem like this
long ago when someone was using vlans AND the lagg device, the issue was
that the em
driver never received the vlan attach events because lagg ate them, so to
speak :)
Still I think this was only an issue wit
On 12/6/2010 8:18 PM, Mihai-Catalin Salgau wrote:
> Hello Freebsd-net,
>
> I have two dual port NICs, one Broadcom(bce0,bce1) and one Intel(em0,em1),
> on FreeBSD 8-stable
> (about two weeks old) with a DHCP server running.
Hi,
There were a bunch of changes to RELENG_8's em driver a
I assumed he was, but if you arent running 7.1.8 do that before anything
else.
Jack
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 12/6/2010 8:18 PM, Mihai-Catalin Salgau wrote:
> > Hello Freebsd-net,
> >
> > I have two dual port NICs, one Broadcom(bce0,bce1) and one
> Intel(em0,em
Hi!
1. ah->ar_hln - is depend from ar_hrd?
Yes, and for ARPHRD_ETHER is 6 (ETHER_ADDR_LEN)
For ARPHRD_IEEE1394 - sizeof(struct fw_hwaddr)
ah->ar_hln ignored in ether_output: bcopy(ar_tha(ah), edst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
check in in_arpinput:
if (ifp->if_addrlen != ah->ar_hln) {
Old Synopsis: 8.2-PRERELEASE panic in NETGRAP
New Synopsis: [netgraph] [panic] 8.2-PRERELEASE panic in netgraph
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Dec 7 19:53:11 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reclassify and assi
Hi, Rozhuk--
On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:19 AM, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 1. ah->ar_hln - is depend from ar_hrd?
> Yes, and for ARPHRD_ETHER is 6 (ETHER_ADDR_LEN)
> For ARPHRD_IEEE1394 - sizeof(struct fw_hwaddr)
> ah->ar_hln ignored in ether_output: bcopy(ar_tha(ah), edst, ETHER_ADDR_LEN);
Had been running a wireless bridge for some months in rc.conf:
ifconfig_bridge0="addm wlan0 addm re1 up"
Updated to 8.2-PRERELEASE 2 days ago and when the machine boots
the bridge has no members.
Reversing the order of the members results in the bridge having just
the re1 member.
Running the ab
Hello Mike,
Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 8:13:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> There were a bunch of changes to RELENG_8's em driver a week ago.
> Perhaps update to that first. But what sort of em nics do you have ?
> pciconf -lvc will show it. I have a number of boxes with 20 or more
> ifconf
On 12/7/2010 6:45 PM, Mihai-Catalin Salgau wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 8:13:26 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> There were a bunch of changes to RELENG_8's em driver a week ago.
>> Perhaps update to that first. But what sort of em nics do you have ?
>> pciconf -lvc will
12 matches
Mail list logo
