Hello,
In Linux, I can disconnect the socket using:
sa.sin_family = AF_UNSPEC;
val = connect(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, sizeof(sa));
the return value of val is 0; on freebsd, the return value of connect() is -1.
According to Linux's connect(2) man page:
Connectionless sockets may dissolve
t
On 9/27/10, Julian Elischer wrote:
> anyone here have NDIS experience?
>
> On 9/27/10 10:51 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>> Julian Elischer wrote:
#10 0xc0978200 in rt_dispatch (m=0xc764ad00, sa=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c:1374
1374if (V_loif)
(kgdb)
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon :
Oops, sorry. I forgot one more chunk. You need to apply this one in
addition to two patches.
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/7/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h?r1=202861&r2=208995&view=patch
Hi,
Ok I have installed the patches, and rebuilt the kernel.
Unfortunat
In the last weeks I worked for porting the netdump infrastructure to
FreeBSD-CURRENT on the behalf of Sandvine Incorporated.
Netdump is a framework that aims for handling kernel coredumps over
the TCP/IP suite in order to dump to a separate machine than the
running one. That may be used on an inter
Sorry for the late reply,
On 24. Sep 2010, at 12:56 , Lars Eggert wrote:
> This seems very complex. Have you simply tried:
>
> ipv6_defaultrouter="2a01:::3180::1"
> ipv6_ifconfig_re0="2a01:::3183::1 prefixlen 64"
Yes - but you can't add a defaultroute to an ip not on the same sub
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:24:45PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Pyun YongHyeon :
>
> >Oops, sorry. I forgot one more chunk. You need to apply this one in
> >addition to two patches.
> >http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/7/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h?r1=202861&r2=208995&view=patch
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon :
However don't apply the patch to production box.
Hi,
actually the only server of this type is a production box, it was
originally running FreeBSD 7.2 without issue but was upgraded when 7.2
went EOL.
What would you recommend? I guess I can wait for this to be
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:08:24PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Pyun YongHyeon :
>
> > However don't apply the patch to production box.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> actually the only server of this type is a production box, it was
> originally running FreeBSD 7.2 without issue but was upgra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 9/22/2010 1:32 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
| Hello,
|
| Can anyone try a patch for adding 6rd (RFC 5569) support to stf(4)?
Well I don't want to be "Mr. Negativity," but I'd like to suggest that
adding this support is the wrong way to go. STF and t
Synopsis: [icmp] [panic] ICMP redirect on causes "panic: rtqkill route really
not free"
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: delphij
State-Changed-When: Wed Sep 29 05:55:38 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
A bandaid have been committed against -HEAD.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: f
10 matches
Mail list logo
