Hello!
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:24:53PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
[...]
> Andre, could you please take a look at one more patch as well?
>
> Igor reported that it still sees 100ms delays with rfc3465 turned
> on, and it turns out to be similar issue (setting cwnd to 1*MSS)
> for hosts foun
Hello freebsd-net!
It was asked many times, but i'll bump it again.
There was patch in 8.0 to allow CARP as module
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-April/021774.html
But it was not committed...
Any chances to see CARP as module in GENERIC? My interest is to use
freebsd-update wi
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, c0re wrote:
Hey,
It was asked many times, but i'll bump it again.
There was patch in 8.0 to allow CARP as module
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-April/021774.html
But it was not committed...
Any chances to see CARP as module in GENERIC? My interest is to
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Quoting Pyun YongHyeon :
Order wouldn't be important but you have to apply both patches.
Hi,
After successfully applying the patchs I get this error when doing a make:
# make
Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/modules/bge
@ -> /usr/src/sys
machine -> /usr/sr
On 25.09.2010 18:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:20:19AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 25.09.2010 09:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
over the last few years there has been a bit of talk about some changes
people want to see in mbufs
for 9.x
extra fields, changes in the way thing
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
> >my idea was to have an extra field in the mbuf to tell how much room
> >should be reserved/used for metadata (such as mtags) after
> >the payload area so you don't need to change the allocator, and
> >possibly can even modify t
On 26.09.2010 08:32, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/25/10 1:20 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 25.09.2010 09:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
over the last few years there has been a bit of talk about some changes people
want to see in mbufs
for 9.x
extra fields, changes in the way things are done, etc.
On 27.09.2010 15:18, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
my idea was to have an extra field in the mbuf to tell how much room
should be reserved/used for metadata (such as mtags) after
the payload area so you don't need to change the allocator,
On 27.09.2010 10:12, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:24:53PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
[...]
Andre, could you please take a look at one more patch as well?
Igor reported that it still sees 100ms delays with rfc3465 turned
on, and it turns out to be similar issue (setti
Hi,
I have attached a patch which allows to do flow classifications in userland
(e.g based on url categories, LDAP users)
and do bandwidth control in kernel(dummynet).
The patch has
a) a setsocketopt, to associate a pipe to the socket.
b) an ipfw option(sockarg) to redirect flows to correspondi
On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Paul Joe wrote:
> I have attached a patch which allows to do flow classifications in userland
> (e.g based on url categories, LDAP users)
> and do bandwidth control in kernel(dummynet).
>
> The patch has
>
> a) a setsocketopt, to associate a pipe to the socket.
>
>
On 9/27/10 6:14 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 27.09.2010 15:18, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
my idea was to have an extra field in the mbuf to tell how much room
should be reserved/used for metadata (such as mtags) after
the payload ar
On 9/27/10 6:09 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 26.09.2010 08:32, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/25/10 1:20 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 25.09.2010 09:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
over the last few years there has been a bit of talk about some
changes people want to see in mbufs
for 9.x
extra fiel
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:27:13PM +0100, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Pyun YongHyeon :
>
> >
> >Order wouldn't be important but you have to apply both patches.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> After successfully applying the patchs I get this error when doing a make:
>
Oops, sorry. I forgot one more
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:25 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Paul Joe wrote:
>
> > I have attached a patch which allows to do flow classifications in
> userland
> > (e.g based on url categories, LDAP users)
> > and do bandwidth control in kernel(dummynet).
> >
> > The patc
On 27.09.2010 18:09, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/27/10 6:14 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 27.09.2010 15:18, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
my idea was to have an extra field in the mbuf to tell how much room
should be reserved/used for m
On 27.09.2010 18:13, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/27/10 6:09 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 26.09.2010 08:32, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/25/10 1:20 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 25.09.2010 09:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
* dynamically working out what the front padding size should be.. per sessi
The following reply was made to PR kern/149804; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/149804: commit references a PR
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:27:05 + (UTC)
Author: delphij
Date: Mon Sep 27 19:26:56 2010
anyone here have NDIS experience?
On 9/27/10 10:51 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
#10 0xc0978200 in rt_dispatch (m=0xc764ad00, sa=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c:1374
1374if (V_loif)
(kgdb) list
1369}
1370*(unsi
20 matches
Mail list logo
