Just the changes in sys/dev/e1000 required or are there any other dependencies?
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Jack Vogel
To: Steven Hartland
Cc: Robin Sommer ; freebsd-net
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: igb watchdog timeouts
Try the
Hi freebsd-net,
I'm trying to run a root server using FreeBSD using four different
IP addresses. Everything works fine with one IP address, but if I
add more addresses I notice a packet loss of about 10% after some
minutes, in rare cases after three hours. Sometimes the packet loss
raises to 50% a
I believe so, let me verify that for sure on a system in our validation lab
this morning,
stay tuned
Jack
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Just the changes in sys/dev/e1000 required or are there any other
> dependencies?
>
> Regards
> Steve
>
> - Origin
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 08:35 +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> the same was for me untill i upgraded BIOS up to the latest one
> available from the MB vendor site
I'm going to try the driver from 8-STABLE, as suggested by Jack
(thanks!), but for the record, I've already updated the BIOS and I'm
my problem, please answer. Maybe a single keyword is enough. :)
Check: Heat ? Voltages ?
( I've had a few bits of hardware die the last few weeks, it's been
hot the last few weeks here in Munich where Frank & I are )
Electrolytic capacitors when hotter dry & degrade faster ..
Just a guess / last
Robin Sommer (ro...@icir.org) [10.07.30 18:38] wrote:
> I'm going to try the driver from 8-STABLE, as suggested by Jack
> (thanks!), but for the record, I've already updated the BIOS and I'm
> still seeing the timeouts.
just have CVS-ed to RELENG_8, recompiled the kernel and loaded the
drivers em
Old Synopsis: in_pcbbind: redundant test
New Synopsis: [inet] [patch] in_pcbbind: redundant test
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 30 17:41:19 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://ww
At 12:52 PM 7/30/2010, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
but the maximum i was able to get was 500Mbit/s
btw, is it correct to test it such way?
Try using the tools in /usr/src/tools/tools/netrate
you can generate a lot more traffic this way.
---Mike
--
Zeus V. Panchenko
IT Dpt., IBS ltd
Mike Tancsa (m...@sentex.net) [10.07.30 20:25] wrote:
>
> Try using the tools in /usr/src/tools/tools/netrate
>
> you can generate a lot more traffic this way.
>
thank you Mike,
it works! :)
netsend 10.11.0.2 5 1000 20 60
Sending packet of payload size 1000 every 0.05000s for 60
After upgrading a couple of our systems from 7.2-RELEASE to 7.3-RELEASE,
we have started to see them running out of mbuf's and crashing every
month or so. The panic string is:
kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: 335233024 total allocated
The actual panic signature (backtrace) shows a mem
On 07/30/10 14:10, David DeSimone wrote:
After upgrading a couple of our systems from 7.2-RELEASE to 7.3-RELEASE,
we have started to see them running out of mbuf's and crashing every
month or so. The panic string is:
...
The services on these systems are extremely simple:
SSH (thoug
Steve Polyack wrote:
>
> On 07/30/10 14:10, David DeSimone wrote:
> >After upgrading a couple of our systems from 7.2-RELEASE to 7.3-RELEASE,
> >we have started to see them running out of mbuf's and crashing every
> >month or so. The panic string is:
> ...
>
> >The services on these systems are
All,
I am looking for (again) some understanding of AltQ and how it works
w.r.t. packet through put. I posted earlier this month regarding how
to initially configure AltQ (thanks to everyone's help) and now have
it working over the em(4) drive on a FreeBSD 8.0 platform (HP DL350 G5).
I had to b
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:07:04PM -0700, Patrick Mahan wrote:
> All,
>
> I am looking for (again) some understanding of AltQ and how it works
> w.r.t. packet through put. I posted earlier this month regarding how
> to initially configure AltQ (thanks to everyone's help) and now have
> it working
14 matches
Mail list logo
