Re: [axe][ue0] Device send packets but any host in network can not receive any packet from it.

2010-06-04 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Thursday 03 June 2010 23:46:06 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > Jun 3 18:29:52 homeserv kernel: axe_bulk_write_callback: transfer > > error, USB_ERR_TIMEOUT > > I don't see abnormal things in axe(4). Maybe Hans can help(CCed). > Timeout might mean that the data format is not accepted. --HPS _

Re: A slight change to tcpip_fillheaders...

2010-06-04 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, George Neville-Neil wrote: For what it's worth I checked the assembly for both versions as well. The bzero version does not inline, as you said, and the original does do a move of 0 for each and every field, again on Nehalem with our default version of gcc. I think that for

Re: Is enabling jumbo frames on RTL8111C possible?

2010-06-04 Thread alter...@gmail.com
On Thursday, 3 of June 2010 19:20:38 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > RealTek no longer releases datasheet so it's hard to know required > information to support jumbo frame. It seems driver released by > vendor has magic code which enables jumbo frame as well as DSP > fixups. The magic code is very comple

how cook ng_pipe?

2010-06-04 Thread Богословский Дмитрий
Hi. What is it ng_pipe? How it work? How use it? I dont find any manuals or docs about it. Only links to sources. But it exist in STABLE7... Thanks. -- Thanks,, Bogoslovskiy Dmitriy mailto:she...@hostelnet.ru ___

pf nat & ipfw kernel nat & ng_nat - what uses less computer resources?

2010-06-04 Thread Дмуха Николай
Hello.We have a network. Now we are using pf NAT. But we are interested in some question:1. What type of NAT uses less computer resources?a) pf NATb) ipfw kernel NATc) NG_NAT ?2. BINAT or NAT - what is better? Which one of them is more faster and uses less computer resources with one of firewall

Re: kern/147191: [ppp] Problems with ppp -nat [pppoe], ipfw, dummynet

2010-06-04 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
El 03/06/2010 9:15, Ian Smith escribió: On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/147191; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Jose M Rodriguez > To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: kern/147191: [ppp] Problems with ppp -n

re: [trouble] restart network & vlan`s interface (if_vlan / conf/63700 redux)

2010-06-04 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
[Originally from freebsd-hackers@ / Feb 2008] All: pf conf/63700 got the ball rolling on fixing cloned/VLAN interface management with rc.d/netif, but problems still remain. For example, adding an alias to a VLAN and running: /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart is a f