Re: Sudden mbuf demand increase and shortage under the load (igb issue?)

2010-02-19 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Jack Vogel wrote: This thread is confusing, first he says its an igb problem, then you offer an em patch :) I suspect it could be patch for the kern/140326. -Maxim ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: CARP vs. if_bridge

2010-02-19 Thread Max Laier
On Thursday 18 February 2010 18:02:55 Boris Kochergin wrote: > Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP > and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet > controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R and 8.0-R. The > test setup is simple enou

Re: mpd has hung

2010-02-19 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:32:37 +0200 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On 2/17/2010 3:26 PM, Alexander Shikoff wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I have mpd 5.3 running on 8.0-RC1 as PPPoE server (now only 5 clients). >> Today mpd process hung and I cannot kill it with -9 signal, and I cannot >> access it's consol

Re: CARP vs. if_bridge

2010-02-19 Thread Boris Kochergin
Max Laier wrote: On Thursday 18 February 2010 18:02:55 Boris Kochergin wrote: Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R and 8.0-R. The test setup

Re: Sudden mbuf demand increase and shortage under the load (igb issue?)

2010-02-19 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:43:20PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > This thread is confusing, first he says its an igb problem, then you offer > an em patch :) > > I have an important rev of igb that I am about ready to release, anyone that > wishes to > test against a problem they have would be welcome

Slow speeds experienced with Dummynet

2010-02-19 Thread rihad
Hi, all, Recalling my old posting "dummynet dropping too many packets" dated October 4, 2009, the problem isn't over just yet. This time, there are no interface i/o drops (just a reminder: we have 2 bce(4) GigE cards connected to a Cisco router, one for input, and one for output. The box itse

Re: kern/143855: [bpf] [patch] non-blocking BPF reads return -1/EWOULDBLOCK until the store buffer fills up

2010-02-19 Thread jkim
Synopsis: [bpf] [patch] non-blocking BPF reads return -1/EWOULDBLOCK until the store buffer fills up Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->jkim Responsible-Changed-By: jkim Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 19 22:29:28 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take it. http://www.freebsd.org/c

Re: Please review: kern/143855

2010-02-19 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 18 February 2010 06:02 pm, Wesley Shields wrote: > I'm looking for someone with knowledge of BPF to review this patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/bpf.diff > > It's basically a fixed version of the one in kern/143855. Using the > test program provided I was able to get the callba