On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:20:13AM +, Dennis Yusupoff wrote:
>
> This bug looks exactly as mine:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/141843
>
> And IMHO, it's a really critical severity.
I confirm the issue.
Exactly the same up-downs on 8.0-RELEASE-p2 (amd64)
7.2-RELEAS
Hello,
I have a problem with my little network test.
I want to test sctp between ubuntu and freebsd.
On ubuntu I wrote a iptables rule which delete every tenth (10) data package.
Freebsd has no firewall rules.
But only ubuntu sends data and freebsd only acknowledge this data (i did the
test with
Hi Frank,
you might want to send both wireshark trace to me and I would have a look.
If it is a bulk transfer, maybe the Ubuntu machine did not capture all packets.
The number of dropped packets is displayed when you stop capturing.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 18, 2010, at 3:35 PM, frank.schust
On 2/17/2010 3:26 PM, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello All,
I have mpd 5.3 running on 8.0-RC1 as PPPoE server (now only 5 clients).
Today mpd process hung and I cannot kill it with -9 signal, and I cannot
access it's console via telnet.
State of process in `top` output is STOP:
73551 root
All,
I have seen a few mentions on the mailing lists in regard to issues
with em(4) and FreeBSD 8.0 with regard to throughput.
We are also seeing similar issues on HP Proliant systems with
this HP GE interfaces. Previously we were running FreeBSD 6.2 and
iperf was showing ~900 Mbits/sec between
Ahoy. I'm seeing what appears to be erroneous interaction between CARP
and if_bridge on multiple machines with a variety of Ethernet
controllers and architectures. I've observed it on 7.2-R and 8.0-R. The
test setup is simple enough:
CARP master:
FreeBSD t30 8.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:32:48AM -0800, Patrick Mahan wrote:
> All,
>
> I have seen a few mentions on the mailing lists in regard to issues
> with em(4) and FreeBSD 8.0 with regard to throughput.
>
> We are also seeing similar issues on HP Proliant systems with
> this HP GE interfaces. Previou
I have encountered a problem with a 802.11n router Belkin F5D8631au.
The beacon and association response frames sent by this router do not
contain
WME information element although 802.11n mode is enabled. These frames
contain
HT capability IE and HT info. Because WME IE is missing in association
re
I'm looking for someone with knowledge of BPF to review this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~wxs/bpf.diff
It's basically a fixed version of the one in kern/143855. Using the test
program provided I was able to get the callback to be called with this
patch. Without it the callback was never call
Folks,
Indeed, it looks like igb(4) issue. Replacing the card with the
desktop-grade em(4)-supported card has fixed the problem for us. The
system has been happily pushing 110mbps worth of RTP traffic and 2000
concurrent calls without any problems for two days now.
e...@pci0:7:0:0: class=0x0
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:05:16PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Indeed, it looks like igb(4) issue. Replacing the card with the
> desktop-grade em(4)-supported card has fixed the problem for us. The
> system has been happily pushing 110mbps worth of RTP traffic and 2000
> concurrent
Hi All,
We're pleased to announce the release of a substantial set of new
and updated software for TCP research using FreeBSD:
- Hamilton Delay Congestion Control Algorithm v0.1 (new)
- Vegas Congestion Control Algorithm v0.1 (new)
- ERTT Khelp Module v0.1 (new)
- Khelp Framework for FreeBSD
Hi Michael,
yeah, I see dropped packages.
But did you mean only that wireshark didn't capture all packages on ubuntu?
Or did you mean that the packages will be really dropped by the kernel?
Because I think it's the first one, can I display the dropped packages - is
there any configuration for wi
This thread is confusing, first he says its an igb problem, then you offer
an em patch :)
I have an important rev of igb that I am about ready to release, anyone that
wishes to
test against a problem they have would be welcome to have early access, just
let me
know.
I am not sure about this ich10
14 matches
Mail list logo
