Re: kern/141843: [em] [vlan] Intel txcsum and assigned vlan invoke wrong dst MAC in TCP packets

2010-01-11 Thread Dennis Yusupoff
The following reply was made to PR kern/141843; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dennis Yusupoff To: pyu...@gmail.com, bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/141843: [em] [vlan] Intel txcsum and assigned vlan invoke wrong dst MAC in TCP packets Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:20:46 +0300

Re: kern/142518: [em] [lagg] Problem on 8.0-STABLE with em and lagg

2010-01-11 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: Problem on 8.0-STABLE with em and lagg New Synopsis: [em] [lagg] Problem on 8.0-STABLE with em and lagg Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jan 11 09:44:54 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: This does no

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2010-01-11 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: kern/140036: [iwn] [lor] lock order reversal with iwn0_com_lock and iwn0 softc lock

2010-01-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
To follow-up after a fairly long hiatus: I had been running Bernhard's driver from his svn repository for a while with no LORs. Over the weekend, I updated past FreeBSD r201882 to pick up Rui's big update from r201209 as well as the firmware error fix in r201882. I do not see the LOR anymore (and

Re: kern/140036: [iwn] [lor] lock order reversal with iwn0_com_lock and iwn0 softc lock

2010-01-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
The following reply was made to PR kern/140036; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Benjamin Kaduk To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/140036: [iwn] [lor] lock order reversal with iwn0_com_lock and iwn0 softc lock Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:51:17 -0500 (EST) Helps if I com

Re: freebsd for Sun Fire X4250

2010-01-11 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Sam Wun wrote: > This server is built with Xeon cpu processor, Intel based. > Can FreeBSD 8+ fully compatible with this server like those ordinary > Intel i386 machine? Although it's hard to say (the Sun website doesn't realy give enough spec details), I'd be surprised if it

ng_patch node

2010-01-11 Thread Maxim Ignatenko
Hi, I've written netgraph node able to modify arbitrary (8|16|32)-bit unsigned integer in passing packets. Node applies one of =,+,-,&,| and ^ operations to number at given offset. Modification applied to each packet received on "in" hook. If "out" hook is connected - resulting packets passed on it

Re: ng_patch node

2010-01-11 Thread Julian Elischer
Maxim Ignatenko wrote: Hi, I've written netgraph node able to modify arbitrary (8|16|32)-bit unsigned integer in passing packets. Node applies one of =,+,-,&,| and ^ operations to number at given offset. Modification applied to each packet received on "in" hook. If "out" hook is connected - resul

Re: ng_patch node

2010-01-11 Thread Maxim Ignatenko
2010/1/12 Julian Elischer : > Maxim Ignatenko wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I've written netgraph node able to modify arbitrary (8|16|32)-bit >> unsigned integer in passing packets. Node applies one of =,+,-,&,| and >> ^ operations to number at given offset. >> Modification applied to each packet received on

Re: freebsd for Sun Fire X4250

2010-01-11 Thread Sam Wun
Hi Gavin, The reason I want to stick with i386 is because about few years ago when I tried AMD release of FreeBSD, it didn't have the same level of proficiency as i386 release of FreeBSD - packagThat was my impression at that time. I hope it has changed in this years. Is there any major installati

Re: kern/134079: [em] "em0: Invalid MAC address" in FreeBSD-Current ( 8.0)

2010-01-11 Thread Jaz
The following reply was made to PR kern/134079; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jaz To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, g.zhengm...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/134079: [em] "em0: Invalid MAC address" in FreeBSD-Current ( 8.0) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:32:22 +1100 I have the same prob

Re: kern/134079: [em] "em0: Invalid MAC address" in FreeBSD-Current ( 8.0)

2010-01-11 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Jaz wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/134079; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Jaz > To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, g.zhengm...@gmail.com > Cc: > Subject: Re: kern/134079: [em] "em0: Invalid MAC address" in FreeBSD-Current ( >        8.0) > Date

Re: freebsd for Sun Fire X4250

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Schmehl
We have a SunFire 420 running amd64 FreeBSD release 7.2. I doubt you will have a problem. --On January 11, 2010 5:05:04 PM -0600 Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Sam Wun wrote: This server is built with Xeon cpu processor, Intel based. Can FreeBSD 8+ fully compatible with this

Re: ng_patch node

2010-01-11 Thread Dmitriy Zamuraev
Hi, I've written netgraph node able to modify arbitrary (8|16|32)-bit unsigned integer in passing packets. Node applies one of =,+,-,&,| and ^ operations to number at given offset. Thank you. I think about more functionality... ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.

lagg doesn't fail back to master

2010-01-11 Thread Callum Gibson
Hi all, I've sucessfully setup a lagg0 interface on my laptop to fail the wired connection over to wireless when it's unplugged. I have the following in my rc.conf: wlans_bwi0="wlan0" ifconfig_bwi0="ether XXX" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA mode 11g" cloned_interfaces="lagg0" ifconfig_lagg0="SYNCDHCP laggp

Re: ng_patch node

2010-01-11 Thread Julian Elischer
Dmitriy Zamuraev wrote: Hi, I've written netgraph node able to modify arbitrary (8|16|32)-bit unsigned integer in passing packets. Node applies one of =,+,-,&,| and ^ operations to number at given offset. have an IP version that corrects the checksums as you fiddle bytes. juat an idea Thank

Re: Hi. Regarding "automatic vlan creation"

2010-01-11 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:17:27AM +0200, Artis Caune wrote: > 2009/10/29 Brooks Davis : > >> btw, wouldn't it be nice not to bother with loader.conf when using > >> . syntax? > >> This patch will load if_vlan automatically in this case: > > > > Sorry but my reation is: eww. ??There's no way I'd co

Re: bin/142547: wpa_supplicant(8) drops connection on key renegotiation

2010-01-11 Thread Kevin Dorne
The following reply was made to PR bin/142547; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kevin Dorne To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/142547: wpa_supplicant(8) drops connection on key renegotiation Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:16:46 -0800 The same behavior occurs with the SVN driver. _

Re: vimage vs. ipfilter

2010-01-11 Thread G. Paul Ziemba
jul...@elischer.org (Julian Elischer) writes: >[vimage compatibility in 8.0] >ipfw is, (experimentally) and pf has patches to make it so. Thanks for your reply (and for your vimage efforts). I'd like to try vimage + pf and searched for the patch (including freebsd-pf and freebsd-virtualization l

Re: vimage vs. ipfilter

2010-01-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: jul...@elischer.org (Julian Elischer) writes: [vimage compatibility in 8.0] ipfw is, (experimentally) and pf has patches to make it so. Thanks for your reply (and for your vimage efforts). I'd like to try vimage + pf and searched for the patch (inc

Re: ng_patch node

2010-01-11 Thread Alexander Motin
Maxim Ignatenko wrote: > I've written netgraph node able to modify arbitrary (8|16|32)-bit > unsigned integer in passing packets. Node applies one of =,+,-,&,| and > ^ operations to number at given offset. > Modification applied to each packet received on "in" hook. If "out" > hook is connected - r