Old Synopsis: lock order reversal with iwn0_com_lock and iwn0 softc lock
New Synopsis: [iwn] [lor] lock order reversal with iwn0_com_lock and iwn0 softc
lock
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 28 08:20:57 UTC 20
Does anyone know if this usb wifi adapter [LINKSYS WUSB600N, 802.11a/b/g] works
with -CURRENT or 8.0-RC?
Thanks
Ivor
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] Resource leak in LibAliasRefreshModules() in file
sys/netinet/libalias/alias.c
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: brueffer
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 28 13:10:37 CET 2009
State-Changed-Why:
Committed, thanks!
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd
Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single
snort process listen on more than one NIC.
At the time it was only possible in Linux.
Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up.
Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snort
processes to listen on
Hi
Now that FreeBSD has support for writing , cloned_interfaces="em0.100"
instead of having to create for example a vlan0 and then specify vlandev
etc in ifconfig. What is the correct ifconfig-line in rc.conf for this?
ifconfig_em0.100="" or ifconfig_em0_100="" does not work.
Sincerely,
Seb
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a single
> snort process listen on more than one NIC.
> At the time it was only possible in Linux.
>
In Linux the packet capture facility is implemented in a different
(and
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Some years ago, I checked to see whether I would be able to let a
single snort process listen on more than one NIC.
At the time it was only possible in Linux.
Now, I searched a bit, but nothing new came up.
Did anything improve since then? Do we still need multiple snor
2009/10/28 Sebastian Hyrwall :
> Hi
>
> Now that FreeBSD has support for writing , cloned_interfaces="em0.100"
> instead of having to create for example a vlan0 and then specify vlandev etc
> in ifconfig. What is the correct ifconfig-line in rc.conf for this?
>
> ifconfig_em0.100="" or ifconfig_em
Hi.
Ah ok. Well I did add that but maybe there was a typo somewhere else.
Unfortuently I can't reach the server anymore (i wonder why heh ;) so I
gave this email a try before going to the datacenter to fix it.
Thanks for the input.
Artis Caune skrev:
2009/10/28 Sebastian Hyrwall :
Hi
N
In FreeBSD 8.0-RC1, igb can't work with lagg, however, em(82571) works.
Is there something weird with igb driver?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-
Hiya
I have a server which acts as a gateway between the internet and my
internal network. The external interface receives its IP address via
DHCP. I set up pf.conf to allow DHCP packets via ports 67/68, but I
notice that when the server boots, the DHCP exchange happens /before/
PF gets
Jonathan Belson wrote:
Hiya
I have a server which acts as a gateway between the internet and my
internal network. The external interface receives its IP address via
DHCP. I set up pf.conf to allow DHCP packets via ports 67/68, but I
notice that when the server boots, the DHCP exchange happe
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Sebastian Hyrwall wrote:
> Hi
>
> Now that FreeBSD has support for writing , cloned_interfaces="em0.100"
> instead of having to create for example a vlan0 and then specify vlandev
> etc in ifconfig. What is the correct ifconfig-line in rc.conf for this?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:46:00AM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I googled a bit on this question but could not find
> a clear answer :
>
> is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting
> a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old
> way and leaving the 'sharenfs
Old Synopsis: ARP not sent through Bridge Firewall with BCE network dirver
New Synopsis: [bce] [arp] ARP not sent through Bridge Firewall with BCE network
dirver
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 28 18:37:36 UT
2009/10/28 Brooks Davis :
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Sebastian Hyrwall wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Now that FreeBSD has support for writing , cloned_interfaces="em0.100"
>> instead of having to create for example a vlan0 and then specify vlandev
>> etc in ifconfig. What is the correct ifco
David Christensen wrote:
Thanks for the rapid response.
Dell have firmware 5.0.9 on their website here: http://tiny.cc/ex834
Will that work?
Yes, that release does include a good version of BCM5709 bootcode (v5.06).
I couldn't really tell until I downloaded the file and looked at the
tempor
The following reply was made to PR kern/139145; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Sten Spans
To: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/139145: IPv6 blackhole / reject routes broken
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:05:45 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.o
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:31:49AM +0200, Artis Caune wrote:
> 2009/10/28 Brooks Davis :
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Sebastian Hyrwall wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Now that FreeBSD has support for writing ??, cloned_interfaces="em0.100"
> >> instead of having to create for example a v
The following reply was made to PR kern/124127; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Atkinson
To: freebsd prs
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/124127: [msk] watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) --
recovering
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
=0A=0AOn the unpatched -current kernel, built
I remember looking at this bug and tried to reproduce it ...
If my memory serves me right, I believe this bug was fixed by
svn r197364, committed on 9/20. RC1 was built on 9/17.
Another symptom of this bug is the "route get" command issued
on any lo0 addresses returns "destination: default" in
21 matches
Mail list logo
