Peter Jeremy wrote:
Since the problem only appears to manifest when table(0) exceeds 2000
entries, have you considered splitting (at least temporarily) that
table (and possibly table(2)) into two (eg table(0) and table(4))?
This would help rule out an (unlikely) problem with table sizes.
It was
rihad wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Since the problem only appears to manifest when table(0) exceeds 2000
entries, have you considered splitting (at least temporarily) that
table (and possibly table(2)) into two (eg table(0) and table(4))?
This would help rule out an (unlikely) problem with table
rihad wrote:
rihad wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Since the problem only appears to manifest when table(0) exceeds 2000
entries, have you considered splitting (at least temporarily) that
table (and possibly table(2)) into two (eg table(0) and table(4))?
This would help rule out an (unlikely) probl
rihad wrote:
I've just split both table(0) and table(2) in two, and the output drops
were brought down to 20-80 up to 150 (in systat -ip). Now there are
around 1700 in each of the tables 0 and 2, and exactly 1500 enries in
each of the tables 10 and 20.
01060 pipe tablearg ip from any to table
On Thursday 15 October 2009 08:15:57 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> .. anyways, I'll post updates on sunday.
Here we go.
http://techwires.net/~bschmidt/patches/freebsd/iwn/
Testers/feedback welcome!
Code is pretty stable although there are still a few open issues. Nothing
major I should be able to
On Oct 18, 2009, at 16:27, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Thursday 15 October 2009 08:15:57 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
.. anyways, I'll post updates on sunday.
Here we go.
http://techwires.net/~bschmidt/patches/freebsd/iwn/
Testers/feedback welcome!
Code is pretty stable although there are still
Hi Bernhard,
I tried your module on my T400 with a PRO/Wireless 5300 and WITNESS,
INVARIANTS enabled.
If the RF kill switch is set to "WLAN disabled", this command sequence
produces a panic:
$ kldload iwnfw
$ kldload if_iwn
$ ifconfig wlan create wlandev iwn0
wlan0
$ ifconfig wlan0 up
iwn0: iwn_in
On Sunday 18 October 2009 21:41:36 Lucius Windschuh wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
> I tried your module on my T400 with a PRO/Wireless 5300 and WITNESS,
> INVARIANTS enabled.
> If the RF kill switch is set to "WLAN disabled", this command sequence
[..]
Thanks for reporting this, there seems to be an issu
Hello,
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 08:15:57 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > .. anyways, I'll post updates on sunday.
>
> Here we go.
>
> http://techwires.net/~bschmidt/patches/freebsd/iwn/
>
> Testers/feedback welcome!
>
> Code is pretty stable although there are still a few open issues. Noth
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Harsha wrote:
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks like a NULL pointer dereference, so perhaps a more traditional bug
>>> --
>>> could you convert ifindex_alloc_locked+0x71 to a line of code? You can do
>>> this using kgdb on the kernel symbols file,
Synopsis: [wpi] wpi(4) does not work very well under 8.0-BETA4
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->wen
Responsible-Changed-By: wen
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 19 00:23:37 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'll take it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138739
___
Synopsis: [wpi] wpi(4) does not work very well under 8.0-BETA4
Responsible-Changed-From-To: wen->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: wen
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 19 00:53:24 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Sorry I mistake it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138739
_
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 08:15:57 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> .. anyways, I'll post updates on sunday.
>
> Here we go.
>
> http://techwires.net/~bschmidt/patches/freebsd/iwn/
>
> Testers/feedback welcome!
>
> Code is pretty stable altho
Howdy!
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Bernhard Schmidt
wrote:
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 08:15:57 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>> .. anyways, I'll post updates on sunday.
>
> Here we go.
>
> http://techwires.net/~bschmidt/patches/freebsd/iwn/
>
> Testers/feedback welcome!
>
> Code is pretty sta
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> Howdy!
>
>
> Any thoughts on the errors I get with buildkernel (attached)? The
> kernel config has no other changes compared to GENERIC than enabling
> KDB and DDB.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
This is 8-STABLE, r198209 by the way. Sorry for not
Harsha wrote:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Harsha wrote:
wrote:
Looks like a NULL pointer dereference, so perhaps a more traditional bug
--
could you convert ifindex_alloc_locked+0x71 to a line of code? You can do
this using kgdb on the kernel symbols file, perhap
I'm adding Brooks to the cc list since he is mr. dhcp lately. :)
David Horn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> David Horn wrote:
>>> Without seeing the actual tcpdump of the dhcp packets, I would guess
>>> that this is the Classless Static Route option in DHCPv4 (opti
17 matches
Mail list logo
