Re: FreeBSD ARM network speed

2009-10-02 Thread Rui Paulo
On 2 Oct 2009, at 06:58, Yohanes Nugroho wrote: Hi All, I am continuing my work on CNX11XX/STR91XX (more info about the work: http://tinyhack.com/2009/09/28/cnx11xxstr91xx-freebsd-progress/), two important things left are the Flash/CFI driver, and network problem. The Flash/CFI in theory should

Re: FreeBSD ARM network speed

2009-10-02 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:58:38 +0700 Yohanes Nugroho mentioned: > I have two question: > 1. Is the network speed in Freebsd ARM currently slower than Linux ARM? > I don't think so. Our network stack is arch-independent and should perform equally well on all platforms. I've been able to acchieve s

Re: kern/127587: [bge] [request] if_bge(4) doesn't support BCM576X family

2009-10-02 Thread Stanislav Sedov
The following reply was made to PR kern/127587; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stanislav Sedov To: Norikatsu Shigemura Cc: matthieu , bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/127587: [bge] [request] if_bge(4) doesn't support BCM576X family Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:28:55 +0400 Hello, Nori

Re: FreeBSD ARM network speed

2009-10-02 Thread Yohanes Nugroho
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:58:38 +0700 > Yohanes Nugroho mentioned: > >> I have two question: >> 1. Is the network speed in Freebsd ARM currently slower than Linux ARM? >> > > I don't think so.  Our network stack is arch-independent and should p

stuck TIME_WAIT sockets

2009-10-02 Thread Igor Sysoev
The TIME_WAIT sockets suddenly started to grow on a host running FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE, date=2009.09.06.23.59.59 Usually there are 3,000-5,000 TIME_WAIT sockets on the host. However, today they stared to grow, have reached 110,000 sockets in hour and still remain on this level. net.inet.tcp.msl is 300

Re: stuck TIME_WAIT sockets

2009-10-02 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 05:06:46PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > The TIME_WAIT sockets suddenly started to grow on a host running > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE, date=2009.09.06.23.59.59 > Usually there are 3,000-5,000 TIME_WAIT sockets on the host. > However, today they stared to grow, have reached 110,000 s

Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread remodeler
Thank you to Julian for his kind response on my original question. I have succeeded with the "jail [...] vnet [...]" syntax Julian suggested. I looked through the /etc/rc.d/jail script and discovered why I cannot start a vnet jail with the rc mechanism - the vnet parameter to jail requires the -c f

Re: stuck TIME_WAIT sockets

2009-10-02 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:06:21PM -0400, Skip Ford wrote: > Igor Sysoev wrote: > > The TIME_WAIT sockets suddenly started to grow on a host running > > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE, date=2009.09.06.23.59.59 > > Usually there are 3,000-5,000 TIME_WAIT sockets on the host. > > However, today they stared to g

Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread Glen Barber
Hi On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:36 PM, remodeler wrote: [snip] > I wonder if someone might help with a problem I am unable to resolve. I have > no network connectivity from the vnet jail. I have opened the jail completely > up for testing, mounting the host devfs, procfs, allowing raw sockets, and

Re: stuck TIME_WAIT sockets

2009-10-02 Thread Skip Ford
Igor Sysoev wrote: > The TIME_WAIT sockets suddenly started to grow on a host running > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE, date=2009.09.06.23.59.59 > Usually there are 3,000-5,000 TIME_WAIT sockets on the host. > However, today they stared to grow, have reached 110,000 sockets in hour > and still remain on this l

Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread Julian Elischer
remodeler wrote: Thank you to Julian for his kind response on my original question. I have succeeded with the "jail [...] vnet [...]" syntax Julian suggested. I looked through the /etc/rc.d/jail script and discovered why I cannot start a vnet jail with the rc mechanism - the vnet parameter to jai

Re: stuck TIME_WAIT sockets

2009-10-02 Thread Skip Ford
Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:06:21PM -0400, Skip Ford wrote: > > Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > The TIME_WAIT sockets suddenly started to grow on a host running > > > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE, date=2009.09.06.23.59.59 > > > Usually there are 3,000-5,000 TIME_WAIT sockets on the host. > > > H

Fw: Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread remodeler
Thank you Glen: (sorry this copied twice to glen) > Do you have your nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf ? The jail and hostname both have /etc/resolv.conf set to a nameserver on the local host. I get the same error message pinging to the private-space address of the physical ethernet interface (the s

Re: Fw: Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread Julian Elischer
remodeler wrote: Thank you Glen: (sorry this copied twice to glen) Do you have your nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf ? The jail and hostname both have /etc/resolv.conf set to a nameserver on the local host. I get the same error message pinging to the private-space address of the physical ethern

Re: FreeBSD ARM network speed

2009-10-02 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 12:58:38PM +0700, Yohanes Nugroho wrote: > Hi All, > Hi, [...] > The specification for the STR9104 SoC is available on Cavium website > for those who are interested, but it is not very clear, so in > developing the network driver, I followed the logic used by the Linux

Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread remodeler
Julian wrote: > I think you need to add a default rule for starters as there is no > route to 192.168.x.x in your jail. tempvnet# route show default route: writing to routing socket: No such process tempvnet# route add default 192.168.0.1 route: writing to routing socket: Network is unreachable

Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread Julian Elischer
remodeler wrote: Julian wrote: I think you need to add a default rule for starters as there is no route to 192.168.x.x in your jail. tempvnet# route show default route: writing to routing socket: No such process tempvnet# route add default 192.168.0.1 route: writing to routing socket: Networ

Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread remodeler
Hi: > Without doing anything extra except booting, (with no jails started), > what happens when you duplicate my commands in the previous email? #jail -c host.hostname=test path=/ vnet persist I substituted persist parameter for command=/bin/tcsh in your example, otherwise the jail is destroyed

Unusual TCP options can cause FreeBSD to issue a reset

2009-10-02 Thread Kevin Oberman
I have a system that is unable to connect to a FreeBSD system due to the odd formatting of the TCP options. The options contains only the timestamp which, if recommendations in RFC1323 are followed, are preceded by two NOP bytes to put the timestamp values on 4 byte boundaries. This system sends t

Re: vimage-assigning interface to jail

2009-10-02 Thread Julian Elischer
remodeler wrote: Hi: Without doing anything extra except booting, (with no jails started), what happens when you duplicate my commands in the previous email? #jail -c host.hostname=test path=/ vnet persist I substituted persist parameter for command=/bin/tcsh in your example, otherwise the j

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2009-10-02 Thread Kayven Riese
LinkedIn I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Kayven Confirm that you know Kayven Riese https://www.linkedin.com/e/isd/775818287/3Vv1tKWZ/ Every day, millions of professionals like Kayven Riese use LinkedIn to connect with colleagues, find experts, a

Re: zyd & TEW-424UB

2009-10-02 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > I'm using FreeBSD 7-stable on my laptop. The wifi card is not working with > FreeBSD. > > So I just buy a > > Trendnet TEW-424UB > > wifi usb adapter. I find this model in the > > man zyd >

Re: zyd & TEW-424UB

2009-10-02 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:38:13PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > Le 28/09/2009 ? 12:51:10-0700, Weongyo Jeong a ?crit > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:20:00AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > > Le 27/09/2009 00:31, Weongyo Jeong a ?crit : > > > >>> > > > >>> Controller /dev/usb6: > > > >>> addr 1: high s

Re: Why not work whois -6 ?

2009-10-02 Thread Doug Barton
Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > FreeBSD 8.0-BETA4 amd64 > > # whois -6 2a01:d0::1 > whois: connect(): Connection refused > > In man whois written: > -6 Use the IPv6 Resource Center (6bone) database. It contains > net- > work names and addresses for the IPv6 network. > > > T