Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2009-09-21 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: kern/138999: [libc] lighttpd/php-cgi with freebsd sendfile(2) enabled causing kernel to not reenter userland

2009-09-21 Thread gavin
Synopsis: [libc] lighttpd/php-cgi with freebsd sendfile(2) enabled causing kernel to not reenter userland Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: gavin Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Sep 21 11:22:34 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). T

Is this a race in mbuf's refcounting?

2009-09-21 Thread Andrew Brampton
I've been reading the FreeBSD source code to understand how mbufs are reference counted. However, there are a few bits of code that I'm wondering if they would fail under the exactly right timing. Take for example in uipc_mbuf.c: 286 static void 287 mb_dupcl(struct mbuf *n, struct mbuf *m) 288

Re: Is this a race in mbuf's refcounting?

2009-09-21 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Andrew Brampton wrote: I've been reading the FreeBSD source code to understand how mbufs are reference counted. However, there are a few bits of code that I'm wondering if they would fail under the exactly right timing. Take for example in uipc_mbuf.c: 286 static void 287 m

Re: Is this a race in mbuf's refcounting?

2009-09-21 Thread Andrew Brampton
2009/9/21 Bruce Evans : > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Andrew Brampton wrote: > >> I've been reading the FreeBSD source code to understand how mbufs are >> reference counted. However, there are a few bits of code that I'm >> wondering if they would fail under the exactly right timing. Take for >> example i

low ath speed on 8.0-RC1

2009-09-21 Thread Denis Shaposhnikov
Hello, After upgrading from 7.2 to 8.0-RC1 I see strange thing with my ath wifi. I'm running WDS network and have two WRT54GL routers. After boot I see my ath connected to the network and selected bssid 00:1a:70:4e:fd:12. Before I had about 2Mb/s using this bssid. But now I see about 900Kb/s only.

Re: Is this a race in mbuf's refcounting?

2009-09-21 Thread Ed Maste
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Andrew Brampton wrote: > I've been reading the FreeBSD source code to understand how mbufs are > reference counted. However, there are a few bits of code that I'm > wondering if they would fail under the exactly right timing. Take for > example in uipc_mbu

Re: Is this a race in mbuf's refcounting?

2009-09-21 Thread Andrew Brampton
2009/9/21 Ed Maste : > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Andrew Brampton wrote: > > Your analysis is correct; this issue also has a PR, kern/137145. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/137145 > > As you point out it requires that two threads have a reference to the > same non-

Re: low ath speed on 8.0-RC1

2009-09-21 Thread Denis Shaposhnikov
Hello, On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:13:27 +0400 Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: > I see about 900Kb/s only. I'm getting better speed after using > > ifconfig wlan0 bssid 00:1a:70:4e:fd:12 I see also it periodically changes "media:" between OFDM/54Mbps and OFDM/48Mbps. _

Re: kern/136876: [bge] bge will not resume properly after suspend

2009-09-21 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
The following reply was made to PR kern/136876; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/136876: [bge] bge will not resume properly after suspend Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:21:54 -0300 Still present in 8.0-BETA4 and

Re: kern/123347: [bge] bge1: watchdog timeout -- linkstate changed to DOWN

2009-09-21 Thread Brandon Peskin
The following reply was made to PR kern/123347; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brandon Peskin To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, a...@mhm.lv Cc: Subject: Re: kern/123347: [bge] bge1: watchdog timeout -- linkstate changed to DOWN Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:42:59 -0700 I'm seeing this on 7.0-REL