Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load

2009-09-15 Thread peterjeremy
On 2009-Sep-13 07:19:24 -0700, Barney Cordoba wrote: >64bits must be faster than 32bits is patently misguided. My rule of >thumb is that if I don't need 64bits for something, I avoid it. It's not quite that cut-and-dry. The 64-bit ISA is significantly different to the 32-bit ISA and has differe

Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load

2009-09-15 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Tue, 9/15/09, peterjer...@acm.org wrote: > From: peterjer...@acm.org > Subject: Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load > To: "Barney Cordoba" > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 3:38 AM > On 2009-Sep-13 07:19:24 -0700, Barney > Cordoba > wrote: > >6

Re: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries

2009-09-15 Thread Hiroharu Tamaru
Hi, At Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:50:47 -0700, Li, Qing wrote: > Hi, > > Please try patch at > >http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/proxy-arp-patch.diff > > -- Qing Thanks for taking care of it. I tried it, and now proxy arp works on the patched FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT-200902/amd64 as expected. Than

Re: kern/127587: [bge] [request] if_bge(4) doesn't support BCM576X family

2009-09-15 Thread matthieu
The following reply was made to PR kern/127587; it has been noted by GNATS. From: matthieu To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/127587: [bge] [request] if_bge(4) doesn't support BCM576X family Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:25:35 +0200 --0016e6d7e06cd8875604739f640b Content

Re: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries

2009-09-15 Thread Chris Cowart
Hiroharu Tamaru wrote: > At Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:50:47 -0700, Li, Qing wrote: >> Please try patch at >> >>http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/proxy-arp-patch.diff > > Thanks for taking care of it. > > I tried it, and now proxy arp works on the patched FreeBSD > 8.0-CURRENT-200902/amd64 as expe

RE: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries

2009-09-15 Thread Li, Qing
Hi, I have committed the code into -CURRENT and it's now merged into 8 Release branch. So RC1 should contain the fix. -- Qing > -Original Message- > From: Chris Cowart [mailto:ccow...@rescomp.berkeley.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:19 AM > To: Hiroharu Tamaru > Cc: Li, Qing

Re: kern/138850: [dummynet] dummynet doesn't work correctly on a bridge

2009-09-15 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: dummynet doesn't work correctly on a bridge New Synopsis: [dummynet] dummynet doesn't work correctly on a bridge Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Sep 16 01:07:55 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Ove

Can lagg0 failback be prevented?

2009-09-15 Thread Peter Steele
We're using the lag driver to provide automatic failover in case of a network outage. The default configuration looks like this: lagg0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=19b ether 00:a0:d1:e3:58:26 inet 192.168.17.40 netmask 0xf000 broadcast 192.168.31.255 i

Re: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries

2009-09-15 Thread Hiroharu Tamaru
Hi, At Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:05:46 -0700, Li, Qing wrote: > Hi, > > I have committed the code into -CURRENT and it's now merged into 8 > Release > branch. So RC1 should contain the fix. > > -- Qing Excellent! I'll try RC1 when it comes out. Thanks. Hiroharu Tamaru > > -Original Message---

Re: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries

2009-09-15 Thread Erik Klavon
Hi Qing, On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 05:05:46PM -0700, Li, Qing wrote: > I have committed the code into -CURRENT and it's now merged into 8 > Release branch. So RC1 should contain the fix. The patch worked for me as well. Thanks for fixing this so quickly and for getting it in for RC1. I'll test agai

Re: kern/138739: [wpi] wpi(4) does not work very well under 8.0-BETA4

2009-09-15 Thread Paul Dokas
lini...@freebsd.org wrote: Old Synopsis: wpi(4) does not work very well under 8.0-BETA4 New Synopsis: [wpi] wpi(4) does not work very well under 8.0-BETA4 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Sep 12 00:53:04 UTC 2009

Re: kern/138739: [wpi] wpi(4) does not work very well under?8.0-BETA4

2009-09-15 Thread Mark Linimon
The following reply was made to PR kern/138739; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/138739: [wpi] wpi(4) does not work very well under?8.0-BETA4 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:38:23 -0500 - Forwarded message from Paul Dokas