Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, rihad wrote:
The box experiences ~230 mbit/s traffic flow through it. I've doubled
some sysctls after reading polling(4):
kern.polling.each_burst=10 # was: 5
kern.polling.burst_max=350 # was: 150
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64
HZ=1000
How much better do
This is a very new card which I haven't seen before on the market until
recently.
Card: E1G42ET (Intel Gigabit PCIe ET Dual Port Adapter 82576)
Server: Supermicro X7SLA-H
Operating system: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE and 7.2-STABLE
IGB Drivers: 1.4.1 and updated 1.7.3 from intel website
igb0: po
--- On Sun, 9/13/09, rihad wrote:
> From: rihad
> Subject: Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 9:11 AM
> Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
> > 1) Why are you polling with a NIC that can be
> precisely set
--- On Mon, 9/14/09, rihad wrote:
> From: rihad
> Subject: Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load
> To: "Bruce Evans"
> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
> Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 3:38 AM
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, rihad wrote:
> >
> >> The box experiences ~230 mb
--- On Mon, 9/14/09, Andrew Snow wrote:
> From: Andrew Snow
> Subject: Intel Dual port pro/1000: watchdog timeouts and no packets received
> To: "FreeBSD Net"
> Cc: "Jack Vogel"
> Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 3:40 AM
>
> This is a very new card which I haven't seen before on the
> mark
--- On Sun, 9/13/09, rihad wrote:
> From: rihad
> Subject: Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 10:33 AM
> Barney Cordoba wrote:
> >
> > --- On Sun, 9/13/09, rihad
> wrote:
> >> What's wrong with
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Barney Cordoba wrote:
Without polling (current load around 190-200 mbit/s, around
24-26 kpps):
top:
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 8.4%
system, 0.0% interrupt, 91.6% idle
Interrupts/s: 18322 total
28 mpt0 irq16
1999 cpu0: time
6906 em0 irq256
3392 em1 irq257
1999 cpu1: time
1999 cpu2: time
19
The following reply was made to PR kern/127587; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: matthieu
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, n...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/127587: [bge] [request] if_bge(4) doesn't support BCM576X
family
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:38:16 +0200
--0016364c76519f45660
The following reply was made to PR kern/138782; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Vladislav V. Prodan"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, univers...@ukr.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/138782: [panic] sbflush_internal: cc 0 || mb
0xff004127b000
|| mbcnt 2304
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:27:14 +0300
The following reply was made to PR kern/138782; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Vladislav V. Prodan"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, univers...@ukr.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/138782: [panic] sbflush_internal: cc 0 || mb
0xff004127b000
|| mbcnt 2304
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:27:21 +0300
--- On Mon, 9/14/09, rihad wrote:
> From: rihad
> Subject: Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load
> To: "Barney Cordoba"
> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
> Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 7:23 AM
> Barney Cordoba wrote:
> >
> >> Without polling (current load around 190-200
> mbit/s, arou
Hello,
We have a system which makes heavy use of published arp entries. I know
the arp code has been significantly overhauled in 8, but it looks like
this functionality is now broken.
$ arp -s 172.16.132.100 00:0c:29:16:bd:49 pub
If I watch tcpdump on the interface, I see arp requests come in bu
Could you please email me your routing table privately?
Thanks,
-- Qing
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Chris Cowart
Sent: Mon 9/14/2009 10:43 AM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries
Hello,
We
Good day,
I hope this is the appropriate list. I am having issues using BPFs to
filter out traffic captures. If I want to block a specific host by IP, the
traffic is still recorded. I tried tcpdump and get the same results.
Am I missing something?
Examples:
# tcpdump -nt -i igb2 -w tcpdump.p
> I hope this is the appropriate list. I am having issues using BPFs to
> filter out traffic captures. If I want to block a specific host by IP, the
> traffic is still recorded. I tried tcpdump and get the same results.
>
> Am I missing something?
Does your igb2 interface use VLAN encapsulatio
At Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:43:09 -0700, Chris Cowart wrote:
> We have a system which makes heavy use of published arp entries. I know
> the arp code has been significantly overhauled in 8, but it looks like
> this functionality is now broken.
>
> $ arp -s 172.16.132.100 00:0c:29:16:bd:49 pub
>
> If
Hi,
Please try patch at
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/proxy-arp-patch.diff
-- Qing
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Hiroharu Tamaru
Sent: Mon 9/14/2009 6:34 PM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for publ
18 matches
Mail list logo
