Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load

2009-09-13 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Sat, 9/12/09, rihad wrote: > From: rihad > Subject: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Saturday, September 12, 2009, 3:27 AM > The box experiences ~230 mbit/s > traffic flow through it. I've doubled some sysctls after > reading polling(4): > ke

Re: em driver input errors

2009-09-13 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Fri, 9/11/09, Jack Vogel wrote: > From: Jack Vogel > Subject: Re: em driver input errors > To: "Mike Tancsa" > Cc: "Barney Cordoba" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Friday, September 11, 2009, 12:38 PM > Glad to hear this. > > Jack > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:46 AM, > Mike Tanc

Re: em driver input errors

2009-09-13 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Sun, 9/13/09, Barney Cordoba wrote: > From: Barney Cordoba > Subject: Re: em driver input errors > To: "Mike Tancsa" , "Jack Vogel" > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 8:30 AM > > > --- On Fri, 9/11/09, Jack Vogel > wrote: > > > From: Jack Vogel > > S

Re: em driver input errors

2009-09-13 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Sun, 9/13/09, Barney Cordoba wrote: > From: Barney Cordoba > Subject: Re: em driver input errors > To: "Mike Tancsa" , "Jack Vogel" > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 8:40 AM > > > --- On Sun, 9/13/09, Barney Cordoba > wrote: > > > From: Barney Cordob

Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load

2009-09-13 Thread rihad
Barney Cordoba wrote: 1) Why are you polling with a NIC that can be precisely set to interrupt as often or as little as you like? How? 2) Why do so many people run systems with high network load with AMD64 builds when its significantly slower to do so? Do you have google sized databases so yo

Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load

2009-09-13 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Sun, 9/13/09, rihad wrote: > From: rihad > Subject: Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load > To: "Barney Cordoba" > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Sunday, September 13, 2009, 9:11 AM > Barney Cordoba wrote: > > > 1) Why are you polling with a NIC that can be > precisely set

Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load

2009-09-13 Thread rihad
Barney Cordoba wrote: --- On Sun, 9/13/09, rihad wrote: What's wrong with 64 bits? I haven't spent a large portion of my life trying to figure it out exactly, but I'd guess that the larger size of the structures and code results in fewer cache hits. Then what's wrong with also doubling ca

Re: [POLLING] strange interrupt/system load

2009-09-13 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 07:33:06PM +0500, rihad wrote: > Barney Cordoba wrote: > > > > --- On Sun, 9/13/09, rihad wrote: > >> What's wrong with 64 bits? > > > > I haven't spent a large portion of my life trying to figure > > it out exactly, but I'd guess that the larger size of the > > structur

Re: host(1) coredumps

2009-09-13 Thread volker
On 09/13/09 06:27, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Hi! > > For 8.0-BETA3: > > % host -l grosbein.pp.ru. ns2.rucable.net. > ; Transfer failed. > /usr/local/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/unix/socket.c:2486: > REQUIREsock) != ((void *)0)) && (((const isc__magic_t *)(sock))->magic > ==

Re: host(1) coredumps

2009-09-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 05:41:50PM +0200, vol...@vwsoft.com wrote: > > % host -l grosbein.pp.ru. ns2.rucable.net. > > ; Transfer failed. > > /usr/local/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/unix/socket.c:2486: > > REQUIREsock) != ((void *)0)) && (((const isc__magic_t *)(sock))->magic

Re: kern/138782: [panic] sbflush_internal: cc 0 || mb 0xffffff004127b000 || mbcnt 2304

2009-09-13 Thread gavin
Old Synopsis: [panic] sbflush_internal New Synopsis: [panic] sbflush_internal: cc 0 || mb 0xff004127b000 || mbcnt 2304 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: gavin Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Sep 13 20:41:07 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to