Hello,
I'd like to ask for the state of that NAT-T support in 7.2. I've seen a
note in ipsec-tools's OPTIONS for a required kernel patch for 6.x in
order to have NAT-T working. Is this also required for 7.2?
If a kernel patch is needed, is a recent patch available for 7.2?
Does racoon needs to be
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:32:48PM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> Hello,
Hi.
> I'd like to ask for the state of that NAT-T support in 7.2. I've seen a
> note in ipsec-tools's OPTIONS for a required kernel patch for 6.x in
> order to have NAT-T working. Is this also required for 7.2?
> If a kerne
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:38:36 +0200
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:32:48PM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi.
>
>
> > I'd like to ask for the state of that NAT-T support in 7.2. I've
> > seen a note in ipsec-tools's OPTIONS for a required kernel patch
> > for
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:57:59PM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
[...]
> Thank you very much.
>
> Would it be possible that this could be integrated?
> Might be with racoon, that would also be very nice. So far this is the
> only thing I've found in FreeBSD that needs a feature in the base
> instal
Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:38:36 +0200
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:32:48PM +0200, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
Hello,
Hi.
I'd like to ask for the state of that NAT-T support in 7.2. I've
seen a note in ipsec-tools's OPTIONS for a required kernel patch
for
Does anyone have some realistic data on the number of GRE/ipip tunnels
FreeBSD 7.x can reasonably terminate? Assume no IPsec, just standard
encapsulation. I have an ad-hoc need to terminate about 1,4000 static
GRE tunnels (as Cisco 7206's are backordered until September). J
Thanks in advance
Jacobs, Brian wrote:
Does anyone have some realistic data on the number of GRE/ipip tunnels
FreeBSD 7.x can reasonably terminate? Assume no IPsec, just standard
encapsulation. I have an ad-hoc need to terminate about 1,4000 static
GRE tunnels (as Cisco 7206's are backordered until September).
IP unnumbered between the two boxen. I've built some scripts to
automatically generate config files, and then other scripts to
automagically create the GRE interfaces and inject appropriate routes.
GRE numbers are assigned sequentially based on config file lines (and
are of no consequence):
gre4
Old Synopsis: atheros card stops functioning after about 12 hours uptime
New Synopsis: [ath] atheros card stops functioning after about 12 hours uptime
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 17 04:09:22 UTC 2009
Resp
Old Synopsis: Kernel panic and hanging on using SCTP
New Synopsis: [sctp] [panic] Kernel panic and hanging on using SCTP
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 17 04:15:38 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to m
rascal wrote:
>
> If I could ask one more favor; what does your cisco config look like
> that would match one of these? I have got mine configed based on
> someone else's tunnel specs and while I am sure they are comparable I
> wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything.
Here's an example con
11 matches
Mail list logo