Re: kern/134557: [netgraph] [hang] 7.2 with mpd5.3 hanging up - ng_pptp problem

2009-07-02 Thread Bohdan Tymkiv
Hello Mikolaj, I confirm that this patch fixes the issue. Thank you very much! Now pptp through pppoe works fine! Bohdan Tymkiv On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/134557; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Mikolaj Golub > To: bug-

Re: NTP - default /etc/ntp.conf

2009-07-02 Thread David Malone
There are several problems with the default ntp.conf that we've committed to -current. First, we have not followed the vendor recommendations for the pool servers at: http://www.pool.ntp.org/vendors.html We are supposed to contact the people running the pool and ask for a freebsd.pool.ntp

Re: NTP - default /etc/ntp.conf

2009-07-02 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to David Malone: > We are supposed to contact the people running the pool and ask for > a freebsd.pool.ntp.org subdomain. That's a good idea. > Second, we shouldn't have the local clock configured by default. Why? > The local clock should only be configured on a single server in a >

Re: NTP - default /etc/ntp.conf

2009-07-02 Thread David Malone
> > We are supposed to contact the people running the pool and ask for > > a freebsd.pool.ntp.org subdomain. > That's a good idea. OK - should I contact the pool guys and ask for freebsd.pool.org? > > Second, we shouldn't have the local clock configured by default. > Why? When Redhat did this,

Re: NTP - default /etc/ntp.conf

2009-07-02 Thread John Hay
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:55:44AM +0100, David Malone wrote: > > > We are supposed to contact the people running the pool and ask for > > > a freebsd.pool.ntp.org subdomain. > > > That's a good idea. > > OK - should I contact the pool guys and ask for freebsd.pool.org? > > > > Second, we should

dhcpv6 client configuration

2009-07-02 Thread wang_jiabo
Hi, All: I setup a DHCPv6 server and dhcpv6 client on redhat, but who could tell me how to setup a dhcpv6 client on freebsd7.1 or 7.0 thanks jiabo ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To uns

Re: kern/133572: [ppp] [hang] incoming PPTP connection hangs the system

2009-07-02 Thread Dennis Melentyev
The following reply was made to PR kern/133572; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dennis Melentyev To: Mikolaj Golub Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/133572: [ppp] [hang] incoming PPTP connection hangs the system Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:30:33 +030

Re: kern/133572: [ppp] [hang] incoming PPTP connection hangs the system

2009-07-02 Thread Dennis Melentyev
Hi Mikolaj, 2009/6/30 Mikolaj Golub : > > Could you try the patch from kern/134557? Unfortunately, no. I haven't that setup anymore. -- Dennis Melentyev ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To

Netconf / Yang model support?

2009-07-02 Thread Bruce Simpson
Is anyone in the FreeBSD community working on NETCONF support? information here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netconf Interesting that SSH is a mandatory transport. Note: This does NOT appear to be the same as Debian's netconf effort, but I could be wrong: http://netconf.alioth.debian.o

Re: Polling and kern.polling.idle_poll

2009-07-02 Thread Larry Baird
Paul, > Larry Baird wrote: > >The man page for polling states: > >kern.polling.idle_poll > > Controls if polling is enabled in the idle loop. There are no > > reasons (other than power saving or bugs in the scheduler's han- > > dling of idle priority kernel threads) to disable

Re: Polling and kern.polling.idle_poll

2009-07-02 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Thu, 7/2/09, Larry Baird wrote: > From: Larry Baird > Subject: Re: Polling and kern.polling.idle_poll > To: "Paul Thornton" > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Thursday, July 2, 2009, 10:21 AM > Paul, > > > Larry Baird wrote: > > >The man page for polling states: > > >    kern.poll

Re: Polling and kern.polling.idle_poll

2009-07-02 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:21:55AM -0400, Larry Baird wrote: > Paul, > > > Larry Baird wrote: > > >The man page for polling states: > > >kern.polling.idle_poll > > >Controls if polling is enabled in the idle loop. There are no > > >reasons (other than power saving or bugs in the sched

Re: Polling and kern.polling.idle_poll

2009-07-02 Thread Larry Baird
> just to understand -- the patch below is just cosmetics to avoid > seeing the polling thread appear as "SYS" time, right ? Yes. Another fix would be to have the idle thread call poll_idle() like it did in 4.x. The comment for P_NOLOAD says /* Ignore during load avg calculations. */ Look

Re: Polling and kern.polling.idle_poll

2009-07-02 Thread Larry Baird
> Curious as to why you don't simply lay out the $40 for a modern ethernet card > that doesn't need polling to work well? These are low end embedded boxs. No way to upgrade. But in actuallity they have modern (fxp) NICS. From our testing, live lock is a real issue for gateways receiving lots of

IPv6 routing

2009-07-02 Thread Rob Gallagher
Hi, I previously had a freebsd 7.0 box set up as an IPv6 router for my home network, behind a sixxs tunnel. It was running rtadvd to hand out IPv6 addresses from my sixxs block to the network. However, after migrating this configuration over to a newly installed FreeBSD 7.2 box it appears that th

Re: IPv6 routing

2009-07-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
Rob Gallagher wrote in <1d7a7b9d0907020855s469dc3f1x34e7515f1ea6e...@mail.gmail.com>: ro> The only odd thing I can see is that the machine is not getting an ro> IPv6 address on the lan-facing interface, which would explain why it ro> can't route anything. There are no issues with the sixxs tunn

Re: NTP - default /etc/ntp.conf

2009-07-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, David Malone wrote: The local clock should only be configured on a single server in a NTP domain that might be disconnected from the rest of the tree. Since the default config is a client config, it doesn't make sense to have the local clock configured. Even if it was a serve

Re: NTP - default /etc/ntp.conf

2009-07-02 Thread David Malone
> This is handled by having different local clocks in different strata. > I only use 2 such strata -- 1 for server and another for all clients. > But this is not so easy to set up as a default. Indeed - I use 14 for the server, in the hope that it would limit how far the unsynced time would get in

Re: Polling and kern.polling.idle_poll

2009-07-02 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:31:51AM -0400, Larry Baird wrote: > > Curious as to why you don't simply lay out the $40 for a modern ethernet > > card that doesn't need polling to work well? > These are low end embedded boxs. No way to upgrade. But in actuallity > they have modern (fxp) NICS. From

WDS support?

2009-07-02 Thread 刘凯
Hi all: I am looking for information about WDS in freebsd.I wonder whether the WDS is supported and how to config it. thank you ** ** ** Michael Kevin ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To uns

11n-aware rate control algorithm?

2009-07-02 Thread 刘凯
Hi all I am working on someting about 802.11n recently, but 11n transmit requires an 11n-aware rate control algorithm. Does anybody have write the algorithm? Could someone give me some advice and some example to help me. thank you Micheal Kevin ___ fr

Re: WDS support?

2009-07-02 Thread Sam Leffler
Áõ¿­ wrote: > Hi all: >I am looking for information about WDS in freebsd.I wonder whether the > WDS is supported and how to config it. > thank you In HEAD look at tools/tools/net80211/scripts. I don't think the handbook has anything. Sam __