Hi everyone!
I've already asked this one the ipfw list, but maybe someone here got a
hint for me.
I'm trying to configure the queue size in ipfw dummynet larger then 100
slots, but I can't do so since ipfw always tells me that the maximum is
100.
Is there any chance to increase the queue size?
I c
Hello everyone!
I'm using 'pktgen' [1] under linux to generate packets.
My topology looks like this:
(linux-box #1) <---> (em0 - freebsd-gateway - em1) <---> (linux-box #2)
I want to send packets from linux-box #1 to linux-box #2 over the free-bsd
gateway.
The problem is that I can see the pac
Jedrzej Kalinowski wrote:
pluknet pisze:
2009/5/28 Jedrzej Kalinowski :
Is there any way to configure the bridge to add stp protocol to any
added (via ifconfig bridgeX addm ifX) member interface - so to change
the default behaviour? Or specifying it explicitly is unavoidable?
L
On Thu, 28 May 2009, smallpox wrote:
s>hey guys, i've read
s>
[SNIP]
s>
s>in comparison to an intel em.. 32bit, it's linked at a gigabit though.. but no
s>heavy traffic there.
s>
s>--BEGIN WORKING
s>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 /15 sec: 1932426
s>IF-MIB::ifOutOctets.1 /15 sec: 24270520
s>IF-MIB::ifInOct
The following reply was made to PR bin/131365; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Vick Khera
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/131365: route(8): route add changes interpretation of network
specification [regression]
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:57:13 -0400
I'm not really followin
well, from what im told by snmp people, it's what's happening at that
time, so up and down is normal... but not at the rate that the
non-working one is going. and this one's upload and download are spread
out normallly, 24 mbit out, 2mbit in...
current figures on the messed up system:
[07:25:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, smallpox wrote:
s>well, from what im told by snmp people, it's what's happening at that time, so
s>up and down is normal... but not at the rate that the non-working one is
s>going. and this one's upload and download are spread out normallly, 24 mbit
s>out, 2mbit in...
s>
s>cur
--- On Fri, 5/29/09, Sebastian Mellmann
wrote:
> From: Sebastian Mellmann
> Subject: ipfw dummynet queue size limitations
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 4:37 AM
> Hi everyone!
>
> I've already asked this one the ipfw list, but maybe
> someone here got a
> hint f
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 08:52 -0700, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 5/29/09, Sebastian Mellmann
> wrote:
>
> > From: Sebastian Mellmann
> > Subject: ipfw dummynet queue size limitations
> > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 4:37 AM
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> >
me: is it supposed to be sequential ?
me: from low to high ?
netsnmpguy: no, it's the difference between on poll period to the next
he did admit that he doesn't monitor high speed networks so he can't be
too sure.
ifconfig bce0 -tso
bce0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=bb
[1
On Fri, 29 May 2009, smallpox wrote:
s>me: is it supposed to be sequential ?
s>me: from low to high ?
s>netsnmpguy: no, it's the difference between on poll period to the next
The value of ifOutOctets is not the difference between poll periods but it
is just the polled value of the octets that ar
Is 192.168.7.1 the freebsd gateway? Because that would explain it.
You need to send to the linux box's IP
On 2009-05-29, Sebastian Mellmann
wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm using 'pktgen' [1] under linux to generate packets.
>
>
> My topology looks like this:
>
> (linux-box #1) <---> (em0 - free
> Is 192.168.7.1 the freebsd gateway? Because that would explain it.
> You need to send to the linux box's IP
>
>
No, 192.168.7.1 is the linux box.
Cheers,
Sebastian
> On 2009-05-29, Sebastian Mellmann
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> I'm using 'pktgen' [1] under linux to generate
Sebastian Mellmann wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm using 'pktgen' [1] under linux to generate packets.
>
> My topology looks like this:
>
> (linux-box #1) <---> (em0 - freebsd-gateway - em1) <---> (linux-box #2)
>
> I want to send packets from linux-box #1 to linux-box #2 over the free-bsd
>
Hi everybody.
As far as I know the natt patch hasn't been included in the source tree yet.
This fact notwithstanding, is there a patch I can download and apply
manually? I need it rather badly...
Thanks.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Giulio Ferro wrote:
> As far as I know the natt patch hasn't been included in the source tree yet.
> This fact notwithstanding, is there a patch I can download and apply
> manually? I need it rather badly...
There sure is. bz@ sent this over for testing and we ar
Vincent Hoffman wrote:
Possibly try lagg(4) instead? this supports fec and lacp.
Thanks, I'll try as soon as I'm able...
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Synopsis: [patch][fib] Incorrect KASSERTs in sys/net/route.c
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat May 30 01:03:40 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13
The following reply was made to PR kern/135067; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Julian Elischer
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, mjgu...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/135067: [patch] [fib] Incorrect KASSERTs in sys/net/route.c
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:58:48 -0700
if you have 16 fibs then va
19 matches
Mail list logo
