On (13/05/2009 13:29), Brett Glass wrote:
> At 01:07 PM 5/13/2009, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> >This has been implemented as part of Gleb Kurtsov's 2008 SoC project.
> >http://wiki.freebsd.org/GlebKurtsov/Improving_layer2_filtering
> >
> >It has not been committed yet but I beleieve is ready to go
Hi Brett,
I think what you are looking for is called captive portal.
You can look at pfsense - http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Category:Captive_Portal
which comes with such solution into it.
On May 14, 2009, at 1:29 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
At 03:38 PM 5/13/2009, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 12:17 AM 5/14/2009, Ian Smith wrote:
>
> >You can use fixed leases with MAC specified in dhcp for that,
>
> This lets you assign specific addresses to machines with specific MAC
> addresses. But it doesn't inhibit MAC address "cloning," and th
On Thursday 14 May 2009 07:32:22 Li, Qing wrote:
> I have committed the patch, please update your source and
> give it a try.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Qing
>
After fresh csup and rebuild it works again. I suppose your fix wents into
sys/netinet/in.c, as I did not see anything else network related in cs
The following reply was made to PR kern/132984; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Sergey Pronin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, v...@prokk.net
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/132984: [netgraph] swi1: net 100% cpu usage
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:39:35 +0400
--000e0cd311a2045e870469e04ca6
Content-Type: te
The following reply was made to PR kern/134079; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stacey Son
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, g.zhengm...@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/134079: [em] "em0: Invalid MAC address" in FreeBSD-Current
( 8.0)
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:18:35 -0500
I have the same, exac
I have recently noticed problems with data transfers via IPv6. Attempt
to fetch files from dome sites was hanging as soon as the data started
to flow. Felt like an MTU issue, so I tried sending various sizes of
ICMP echo (ping) packets and discovered that I could not send a packet
of over 1280 byte
> First, why is the kernel fragmenting this at all as it fits in the
> interface MTU?
Good question, I definitely disagree with this behavior and would say
that it breaks POLA. But it's documented (see the ping6 -m option).
> Can anyone fetch anything from ftp.funet.fi via IPv6? I suspect it is
>
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:09:02 +0200 (CEST)
> From: sth...@nethelp.no
>
> > First, why is the kernel fragmenting this at all as it fits in the
> > interface MTU?
>
> Good question, I definitely disagree with this behavior and would say
> that it breaks POLA. But it's documented (see the ping6
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Hi,
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:09:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: sth...@nethelp.no
First, why is the kernel fragmenting this at all as it fits in the
interface MTU?
Good question, I definitely disagree with this behavior and would say
that it breaks POLA. But
Old Synopsis: kernel crash related to routes/zebra
New Synopsis: [route] [panic] kernel crash related to routes/zebra
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 14 23:05:22 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to main
11 matches
Mail list logo
