IGMP+WiFi panic on recent kernel - in igmp_fasttimo()

2009-03-13 Thread Vladimir Grebenschikov
Hi Recent 8-CURRENT Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc05f7251 stack pointer = 0x28:0xc4a8db8c frame pointer = 0x28:0xc4a8dc24 code segment

Re: tap(4) SIOCSIFMTU patch

2009-03-13 Thread Rui Paulo
On 13 Mar 2009, at 01:54, Sean C. Farley wrote: Here is a patch[1] that will allow the MTU to be set higher than 1500 on a tap(4) interface. I ran into the need to do this when I had em0 set to 9000 and tried to bridge em0 with tap0 (MTU 1500) for QEMU. A bridge interface will not allow

IGMP+WiFi panic on recent kernel - in igmp_fasttimo()

2009-03-13 Thread Vladimir Grebenschikov
Hi Recent 8-CURRENT Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc05f7251 stack pointer = 0x28:0xc4a8db8c frame pointer = 0x28:0xc4a8dc24 code segment

Re: kern/129846: [panic] /usr/sbin/ppp causes panic "Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock

2009-03-13 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Richard Tector wrote: Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Richard Tector wrote: Just a me too on 7.1-STABLE amd64 (as of 2009-03-05 at least). Note this does not happen with a 7.1-RELEASE kernel, so I'm assuming it's not userland. This problem is believed fixed a

Re: tap(4) SIOCSIFMTU patch

2009-03-13 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rui Paulo wrote: On 13 Mar 2009, at 01:54, Sean C. Farley wrote: Here is a patch[1] that will allow the MTU to be set higher than 1500 on a tap(4) interface. I ran into the need to do this when I had em0 set to 9000 and tried to bridge em0 with tap0 (MTU 1500) for QEMU.

Re: kern/122252: [ipmi] [bge] IPMI problem with BCM5704 (does not work after driver loaded)

2009-03-13 Thread Robert Healey
The following reply was made to PR kern/122252; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Robert Healey To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/122252: [ipmi] [bge] IPMI problem with BCM5704 (does not work after driver loaded) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:33:41 -0400 I am having a similar is

Re: tap(4) SIOCSIFMTU patch

2009-03-13 Thread Bruce Simpson
Sean C. Farley wrote: Yes, this fixes my issue with bridging a tap device to an interface with an MTU higher than 1500. I will probably commit this patch this weekend. I can't think of any reason why not, other than you might want to ensure that tap's MTU is bounded within reasonable limits

Re: IGMP+WiFi panic on recent kernel - in igmp_fasttimo()

2009-03-13 Thread Bruce Simpson
Thanks for this report. Sam has reported wihat I believe is the same issue. I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, I'm absolutely exhausted from working on some other stuff that had to happen right away. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: tap(4) SIOCSIFMTU patch

2009-03-13 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Bruce Simpson wrote: Sean C. Farley wrote: Yes, this fixes my issue with bridging a tap device to an interface with an MTU higher than 1500. I will probably commit this patch this weekend. I can't think of any reason why not, other than you might want to ensure that

Re: tap(4) SIOCSIFMTU patch

2009-03-13 Thread Bruce Simpson
Sean C. Farley wrote: ... Exhausting the jumbo cluster pool refers to kern.ipc.nmbjumbo[p|9|16], yes? em(4) has an upper limit of 16114 for MTU. I could limit the MTU to TAPMRU (16384) which is the limit for a write to the driver anyway. Just waiting for my VFS cache to spool up after a fres

Re: IGMP+WiFi panic on recent kernel - in igmp_fasttimo()

2009-03-13 Thread Bruce Simpson
All I have in the kit box is what appears to be a Belkin branded Ralink cardbus card. I think it's a Ralikn 25xx. I have a PCI-Cardbus bridge, so I'm going to leave a NanoBSD image of SVN HEAD to cook in the background whilst I sort out my humanity... __