Virtual machine on freebsd

Hi to all, i want to install a virtual machine on my FreeBSD 7.0 box. Can you tell me which is the better sofware to do this? Thanks in advance Antonio ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To u

bgp, is-is, ...

openbgp is said to be the best bsd implementation of bgp. but i see that ports/openbgpd has not been updated in a while. it is at 4.0 while 4.3 is the current public release. ports/quagga is at 0.99.10, while the public release is 0.99.11. so that's a bit better. and, as i need is-is, i think

NFS performance tuning?

Hello, Freebsd-net. I have two systems (7-Stable), connected with gigabit link. iperf shows 667 Mbits/sec on TCP and 600Mbit/s on UDP without any tuning. But NFS gives me only 17Mb/s (~136 Mbit/s) on sequential read of very big files, and about 8-10Mb/s on "real" workloads. Are here any gu

Re: NFS performance tuning?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-net. > > I have two systems (7-Stable), connected with gigabit link. iperf > shows 667 Mbits/sec on TCP and 600Mbit/s on UDP without any tuning. > > But NFS gives me only 17Mb/s (~136 Mbit/s) on sequential

Re: bgp, is-is, ...

On Friday 05 December 2008 03:43:41 Randy Bush wrote: > openbgp is said to be the best bsd implementation of bgp. but i see > that ports/openbgpd has not been updated in a while. it is at 4.0 while > 4.3 is the current public release. Actually 4.4 is the latset release, although only available i

Re: bgp, is-is, ...

Brad wrote: > On Friday 05 December 2008 03:43:41 Randy Bush wrote: >> openbgp is said to be the best bsd implementation of bgp. but i see >> that ports/openbgpd has not been updated in a while. it is at 4.0 while >> 4.3 is the current public release. > Actually 4.4 is the latset release, althoug

Re: bgp, is-is, ...

On Friday 05 December 2008 04:28:41 Randy Bush wrote: > but no is-is? not to start an emacs/vi debate, but most of us old > pharts are is-is, as are the big old backbones (and the smarter new > ones:-). Not yet. You're welcome to help start an isisd. ;) So far BGP, OSPF, RIP and DVMRP working. O

Re: NFS performance tuning?

Xin LI wrote: What I usually use is: mount_nfs -3Tr 262144 -w 262144 Yep, it helps to double speed. Much better. How should these options translates to /etc/fstab options? -- // Lev Serebryakov ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://list

vlan support trouble in if_sis driver ?

Hello Using sis card (SiS 900) sis0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xed16-0xed160fff irq 19 at device 4.0 on pci0 # uname -a FreeBSD damask 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 # netstat -bin NameMtu Ne

Re: kern/126984: [carp][patch] add carp userland notifications via devctl(4)

Synopsis: [carp][patch] add carp userland notifications via devctl(4) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: glebius State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 5 14:37:54 UTC 2008 State-Changed-Why: I've just committed a change that makes link state change announcement when CARP changes status.

Re: NFS performance tuning?

On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Xin LI wrote: Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Freebsd-net. I have two systems (7-Stable), connected with gigabit link. iperf shows 667 Mbits/sec on TCP and 600Mbit/s on UDP without any tuning. But NFS gives me only 17Mb/s (~136 Mbit/s) on sequential read of

Re: Virtual machine on freebsd

On December 4, 2008 11:58 pm Antonio Tommasi wrote: > Hi to all, > i want to install a virtual machine on my FreeBSD 7.0 box. Can you tell > me which is the better sofware to do this? For a FreeBSD host, QEmu is the best supported option. There's also Win4BSD, which is a customised/modified versi

Re: Weird TCP connect issue in FreeBSD 6

On 2008-Dec-03 17:40:01 -0500, Benjie Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >When I had two IPs from two different subnets configured for the two >NICs, I had the same error. So while I did have a configuration issue, >the problem with replicated SYNs did occur even when the two NICs had >IP addresses on

Re: Weird TCP connect issue in FreeBSD 6

Local address em0: some IP XXX, with appropriate mask, /27 em1: some IP YYY, on different subnet, with appropriate mask /27 apache: listening on XXX:80, YYY:80, XXX:443, YYY:443 I can connect to the 80 ports on both machine from a third IP on yet another network, and I can connect to XXX:443

Re: vlan support trouble in if_sis driver ?

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 04:42:53PM +0300, Vladimir Ermakov wrote: > Hello > > Using sis card (SiS 900) > sis0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem > 0xed16-0xed160fff irq 19 at device 4.0 on pci0 > > # uname -a > FreeBSD damask 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 > UTC 20