Hi,
yesterday I csup'ped my 8-current sources on my MSI Wind netbook (again) and
tried to build new kernel. There is again a problem with re interface. It
just does not work, with following
re0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem
0xffd1-0xffd10fff,0xffd0-0xffd0 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
re0
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:29:35AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Hi,
> yesterday I csup'ped my 8-current sources on my MSI Wind netbook (again) and
> tried to build new kernel. There is again a problem with re interface. It
> just does not work, with following
>
> re0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff me
Wednesday 29 of October 2008 14:34:05 Alexander Motin napisał(a):
> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> > So now i am lost again. If packet filtering on bge card is counted to
> > irq17: bge0 process so i think it should use more cpu.
> > From what you wrote there should be no difference for me if card use
> >
Bartosz Giza wrote:
> Could you tell me which chipset from intel would you recommend or you know
> that is best from all that you tested.
I haven't investigated that specially to recommend something as most of
my cards are integrated, but now I have newer systems with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: cl
Hello,
I bought a LevelOne WPC-0301 11g Wireless CardBus Adapter
today. According to the box it is "v6". The ral(4) man-
page mentions only v2, but that one is ancient and can't
be bought anymore.
So, enabling the debug sysctl gives this in dmesg:
cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x0
cardb
On Thursday 30 October 2008 11:26:56 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:29:35AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > yesterday I csup'ped my 8-current sources on my MSI Wind netbook (again)
> > and tried to build new kernel. There is again a problem with re
> > interface. It ju
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:41:01PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Thursday 30 October 2008 11:26:56 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:29:35AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > yesterday I csup'ped my 8-current sources on my MSI Wind netbook (again)
> > > and tried
Hi All,
Pardon if this has been posted.
What is really the behavior of the system when
it rate limit icmp (e.g. ICMP response)? Does it
drop the excess of the outbound ICMP responses? If so,
is their a way to see dropped responses from logs or other
mechanism? Can this be turned-on at the inboun
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:21:32 +0100
Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote:
> > Ivan Voras wrote:
> >> Bartosz Giza wrote:
> >>
> >>> Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE
> >>> interface is actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than
> >>> e
