Re: two NIC on 2 core system (scheduling problem)

Tuesday 28 of October 2008 19:10:43 Alexander Motin napisał(a): > Bartosz Giza wrote: > >> The CPU time you see there includes much more then just a card > >> handling itself. It also includes CPU time of the most parts of > >> network stack used to process received packet. So if you have NAT, big

Re: two NIC on 2 core system (scheduling problem)

Bartosz Giza wrote: > Tuesday 28 of October 2008 19:10:43 Alexander Motin napisał(a): >> Bartosz Giza wrote: The CPU time you see there includes much more then just a card handling itself. It also includes CPU time of the most parts of network stack used to process received packet. S

RE: It seems that FreeBSD-7.0 does not use the available MTU

This is indeed the problem, thanks. Is this a known issue with FreeBSD-7.0 ? I do not want to hide a potential bug in the NIC driver. Eitan Shefi -Original Message- From: John-Mark Gurney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:02 PM To: Eitan Shefi Cc: freebsd-ne

Re: two NIC on 2 core system (scheduling problem)

Wednesday 29 of October 2008 11:36:45 Alexander Motin napisał(a): > Bartosz Giza wrote: > > Tuesday 28 of October 2008 19:10:43 Alexander Motin napisał(a): > >> Bartosz Giza wrote: > The CPU time you see there includes much more then just a card > handling itself. It also includes CPU tim

Re: two NIC on 2 core system (scheduling problem)

Bartosz Giza wrote: > So now i am lost again. If packet filtering on bge card is counted to irq17: > bge0 process so i think it should use more cpu. > From what you wrote there should be no difference for me if card use tasq > or irq. Those processes do exactly the same thing? If that is true so

Re: kern/128448: [nfs] 6.4-RC1 Boot Fails if NFS Hostname cannot be resolved (mount_nfs)

Old Synopsis: 6.4-RC1 Boot Fails if NFS Hostname cannot be resolved (mount_nfs) New Synopsis: [nfs] 6.4-RC1 Boot Fails if NFS Hostname cannot be resolved (mount_nfs) Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 29 16:01:4

Re: It seems that FreeBSD-7.0 does not use the available MTU

Eitan Shefi wrote this message on Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:34 +0200: > This is indeed the problem, thanks. > > Is this a known issue with FreeBSD-7.0 ? > I do not want to hide a potential bug in the NIC driver. This is a known issue since I fixed the transmit code not to munge the route's MTU so t

Re: Problem with Bridging ... and bge devices under FreeBSD 7.x?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You nailed it ... I was missing the 'tap.up_on_open=1' ... once I put that in place, it works like a charm ... Thanks ... - --On Tuesday, October 28, 2008 22:37:58 -0700 Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:38:38 -0300 "