Re: [PATCH] recvmsg() sendmsg() linux emulation

2008-09-18 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting "Chagin Dmitry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:02:30 +0400): On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:38:01PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: Please review, any comment will be helpful. I did just a very quick look... @@ -978,9 +1072,13 @@ linux_sendmsg(struct thread *td, struct li

Re: reading routing table

2008-09-18 Thread Debarshi Ray
So I got something working for FreeBSD now: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnu/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz I have been using a combination of sysctl and PF_ROUTE to retrieve the routing table, much like the approach taken by the NetBSD implementation. Support for modifying the routing table is yet to be i

Re: [PATCH] recvmsg() sendmsg() linux emulation

2008-09-18 Thread Chagin Dmitry
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:38:31AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting "Chagin Dmitry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 17 Sep 2008 > 23:02:30 +0400): > > >On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:38:01PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > >> > >>Please review, any comment will be helpful. > > I did just a

Re: [PATCH] recvmsg() sendmsg() linux emulation

2008-09-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:57:36PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > diff --git a/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_io.h > b/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_io.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000..c1a9f1c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_io.h > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +/*- > + * Copyrig

Re: What's the status of parallel netisr?

2008-09-18 Thread Jian Qiu
Thanks again for the info. As you suggested, I did test on the most recent 7.0-stable-200807 kernel. The SMP throughout on the new kernel was improved to around 90MB/s. However, SMP kernel still had no advantage over UP, at least for this kind of single threaded applications. I further did the

Re: [PATCH] recvmsg() sendmsg() linux emulation

2008-09-18 Thread Chagin Dmitry
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:24:54PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:57:36PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > > diff --git a/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_io.h > > b/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_io.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000..c1a9f1c > > --- /dev/null > > +

Re: [PATCH] recvmsg() sendmsg() linux emulation

2008-09-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:07:59PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: I still cannot answer to you, so be it. > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:24:54PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:57:36PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > > > diff --git a/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_io.h > > >

Re: [PATCH] recvmsg() sendmsg() linux emulation

2008-09-18 Thread Chagin Dmitry
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:31:11PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:07:59PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > > I still cannot answer to you, so be it. > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:24:54PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:57:36PM +0400, Chag

Re: What's the status of parallel netisr?

2008-09-18 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:50:10 +0800 > From: "Jian Qiu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks again for the info. > > As you suggested, I did test on the most recent 7.0-stable-200807 kernel. > > The SMP throughout on the new kernel was improved to around 90MB/s. > > How

Re: What's the status of parallel netisr?

2008-09-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
Jian Qiu wrote: Thanks again for the info. As you suggested, I did test on the most recent 7.0-stable-200807 kernel. The SMP throughout on the new kernel was improved to around 90MB/s. However, SMP kernel still had no advantage over UP, at least for this kind of single threaded applications.

Re: reading routing table

2008-09-18 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Debarshi Ray wrote: ... By the way, would you want someone to implement 'show' support for FreeBSD's route implementation? I can give it a go now. :-) For sure, we'd be very happy to see a patch like that. Many thanks BMS ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.o

Re: reading routing table

2008-09-18 Thread Julian Elischer
Bruce M. Simpson wrote: Debarshi Ray wrote: ... By the way, would you want someone to implement 'show' support for FreeBSD's route implementation? I can give it a go now. :-) For sure, we'd be very happy to see a patch like that. Many thanks BMS and don't forget the same patch for netst

Question regarding NFS

2008-09-18 Thread Adam Stylinski
Hello, I am running an IPCop firewall for my entire network. I have a wireless network device on the blue subnet which must access a freebsd NFS server. In order to do this, I need to open a DMZ pinhole on a few select ports. It's my understanding that NFS chooses random ports and I was wo

Code release of ipfw NAT support for SCTP in FreeBSD-8

2008-09-18 Thread Jason But
The Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures (CAIA http://caia.swin.edu.au) is proud to announce the release of alias_sctp version 0.2, an SCTP NAT patch to FreeBSD 8.x. Alias_sctp provides SCTP NAT functionality to the ipfw/ipfw_nat/libalias suite. Alias_sctp version 0.2 is a fully function

Re: MSI Wind Notebook's network interfaces

2008-09-18 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:32:42PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > On Monday 08 September 2008 12:29:12 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 08:03:52AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > It was my pleasure and I would like to express my thanks for your great > > >