--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Quagga OSPF binds to wrong interface on FreeBSD 7
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 11:56 PM
John Lingate wrote:
> This bug was
Hi,
Now that tcpad (TCP Anomaly Detector) is, at least, barely usable, I
decided to talk about it.
First of all, the wiki page http://wiki.freebsd.org/RuiPaulo/TCPAnomaly
talks all about the rationale behind it and how it works.
For your convenience, I'll post it here too:
"tcpad listens for T
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:56:13PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >At Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:50:33 + (UTC),
> >Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>>At Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:40:38 +0200,
> >>>John Ha
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:56:13PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:50:33 + (UTC),
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Hi,
At Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:40:38 +0200,
J
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:32:10AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> >and to be more explicit - the result of m_pullup is that
> >the number of bytes specified as m_pullup argument are in
> >a private piece of memory -- the 'data' region within the mbuf -- so
> >you can freely pl
Hi Joe,
are you able to provide enough information such that I can reproduce
this problem?
Best regards
Michael
On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Joseph Mays wrote:
Hello.
We've recently written an extensive software system that uses SCTP
as a critical component. We've started to run into an
At Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:28:53 +0200,
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> and to be more explicit - the result of m_pullup is that
> the number of bytes specified as m_pullup argument are in
> a private piece of memory -- the 'data' region within the mbuf -- so
> you can freely play with them without trouble.
>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:18:28PM -0500, Jacob Owens wrote:
> To resolve the issue, Pyun first had my patch amphy.c , then the dc driver.
> The DC patch fixed my issue. Here is what i had to do:
>
> 1. save attached patch to /tmp
> 2. #cd /usr/src
> 3. #patch -p0 < /tmp/dc.patch
> 4. rebuild/inst
Old Synopsis: CARP interface destruction with ifconfig destroy causes kernel
panic
New Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface destruction with ifconfig destroy causes
kernel panic
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 29
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:41:45PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:32:10AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> ...
> > >and to be more explicit - the result of m_pullup is that
> > >the number of bytes specified as m_pullup argument are in
> > >a private piece
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:41:45PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:32:10AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
and to be more explicit - the result of m_pullup is that
the number of bytes specified as m_pullup argume
11 matches
Mail list logo
