The following reply was made to PR kern/126561; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dfilter service)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/126561: commit references a PR
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:30:59 + (UTC)
dfr 2008-08-25 09:30:27 UTC
FreeBSD src repo
The following reply was made to PR kern/126714; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Artis Caune" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/126714: [carp] CARP interface renaming makes system no longer
respond on the virtual IP address
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008
Hello freebsd-net
i like freeBSD
--
Best regards,
vako2000 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PRO
The following reply was made to PR kern/124127; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Alexey Pelykh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/124127: [msk] watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) --
recovering
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:01:09 +0300
Also,
2008/8/23 Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> this should work. i simply replaced the lines with a single dot (".") in it
> with "DOT".
You have a truncated mail maybe because of '.' treated as a special
symbol that means "end of body" in SMTP.
> Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
> sblastm
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:03:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:43:39 +0100,
> Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Somehow the data that the device needs to do the proper checksum
> > > offload is getting trashed here. Now, since it's clear w
2008/8/25 pluknet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/8/23 Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> this should work. i simply replaced the lines with a single dot (".") in it
>> with "DOT".
>
> You have a truncated mail maybe because of '.' treated as a special
> symbol that means "end of body" in SMTP.
>
>> Unrea
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:02:07PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:03:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > At Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:43:39 +0100,
> > Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Somehow the data that the device needs to do the proper ch
On Monday 25 August 2008 02:23:16 am M. Warner Losh wrote:
> I did this a few years ago when trying to track down a problem with
> some realtek network chips that I was having problems with at Timing
> Solutions. I'd like to get this into the tree, since it was helpful
> then.
>
> Comments?
When
