Hi,
I get the following when I run portupgrade and it tries to hit the
network for a package on stable. It looks like something has been
broken in ath? Seeing as I don't update very often it could have been
around for a while. Kernel is GENERIC.
Modules are kernel, snd_ich, sound, aio and
David DeSimone wrote:
[ ... ]
Again, I did see these messages in my environment, but in my case, the
error was correct: The IP *was not* on the local network. The reason
being that we had multiple subnets configured on the same broadcast
domain, so the BSD box could indeed hear ARP for subnets
Hi, list. I set up an IPv6-over-IPv4 tunnel from Hurricane Electric
using a gif(4) interface using the commands:
ifconfig gif0 tunnel [source IPv4] [destination IPv4]
ifconfig gif0 inet6 [source IPv6] [destination IPv6] prefixlen 128
route -n add -inet6 default [destination IPv6]
I'm wondering
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:02:35PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Hi, list. I set up an IPv6-over-IPv4 tunnel from Hurricane Electric
> using a gif(4) interface using the commands:
>
> ifconfig gif0 tunnel [source IPv4] [destination IPv4]
> ifconfig gif0 inet6 [source IPv6] [destination IPv6] pr
Dear Paul,
I tried all of this :/ still, 256/512 descriptors seem to work the best.
Happy to let you log into the machine and fiddle around if you want :)
yes, but I'm shure I will also not be able to achieve much more pps.
As it seems that you hit hardware-software-level-barriers, my only id
ULE + PREEMPTION for non SMP
no major differences with SMP with ULE/4BSD and preemption ON/OFF
32 bit UP test coming up with new cpu
and I'm installing dragonfly sometime this weekend :]
UP: 1mpps in one direction with no firewall/no routing table is not too
bad, but 1mpps both directions is the
UP 32 bit test vs 64 bit:
negligible difference in forwarding performance without polling
slightly better polling performance but still errors at lower packet rates
same massive hit with ipfw loaded
Installing dragonfly in a bit..
If anyone has a really fast PPC type system or SUN or something i'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul / Ingo,
>
>> I tried all of this :/ still, 256/512 descriptors seem to work the
>> best. Happy to let you log into the machine and fiddle around if you
>> want :)
I've been watching this thread closely, since I'm in a very similair
situation.
A
Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
The netfpga site seems more or less dead - is this project still alive?
It does look like a very interesting idea, even though it's currently quite
linux-centric (and according to docs doesn't have VLAN nor ip6 support, the
former being quite a dealbreaker)
Just last
Bart Van Kerckhove wrote:
Perhaps you have some better luck at some different hardware systems
(ppc, mips, ..?) or use freebsd only for routing-table-updates and
special network-cards (netfpga) for real routing.
The netfpga site seems more or less dead - is this project still alive?
It does l
10 matches
Mail list logo
