Hi Peter,
i'm having exactly the same problem, but without NAT configuration. Just
a simple host on network 192.168.170.xxx
that when tries to reach an host on 192.168.181.xxx: it gives the same error
arplookup 192.168.181.253 failed: host is not on local network
The funny thing is that IP co
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Paul wrote:
...
---Reboot with 4096/4096(my guess is that it will be a lot
worse, more errors..)
Without polling, 4096 is horrible, about 200kpps less ... :/
Turning on polling..
polling on, 4096 is bad,
input (em0) outp
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Paul wrote:
...
---Reboot with 4096/4096(my guess is that it will be
a lot worse, more errors..)
Without polling, 4096 is horrible, about 200kpps less ... :/
Turning on polling..
polling on, 4096 is bad,
input
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm occasionally seeing pairs of messages like the following on
> my NAT host:
> arplookup 192.168.181.114 failed: host is not on local network
> arpresolve: can't allocate route for 192.168.181.114
We see t
Hi,
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I'm occasionally seeing pairs of messages like the following on
my NAT host:
arplookup 192.168.181.114 failed: host is not on local network
arpresolve: can't allocate route for 192.168.181.114
Normally this happens in badly configured LAN.
Lets say we have two hosts
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Paul wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
No polling:
843762 25337 52313248 1 0178 0
763555 0 47340414 1 0178 0
830189 0 51471722 1 0178 0
838724 0 52000892 1 0178
Dear Stefan,
So my maximum without polling is close to 800kpps but if I push that it
starts locking me from doing things, or
how many kpps do you want to achieve?
Do not know for Paul but, I want to be able to route (and/or bridge to
handle) 600-700mbps syn flood,
which is something like 150
Dear Paul,
Tomorrow comes opteron so it's 1ghz faster than this one, and I can see
if it scales directly with cpu speed or what happens.
can you send me a lspci -v?
I did another SMP test with an interesting results. I took one of the cpus
out of the machine, so it was just left with a
Dear Stefan,
So my maximum without polling is close to 800kpps but if I push that it
starts locking me from doing things, or
how many kpps do you want to achieve?
Do not know for Paul but, I want to be able to route (and/or bridge to
handle) 600-700mbps syn flood,
which is something like 150
OK, my responses to the replies so far.
One off-line reply requested a topology and netstat output. Since the
toplogy may be relevant, below is an extremely simplified approximation
(the real network has about 60 subnets and about 70 hosts, each
appearing in between two and four subnets).
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Paul wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
No polling:
843762 25337 52313248 1 0178 0
763555 0 47340414 1 0178 0
830189 0 51471722 1 0178 0
838724 0 52000892
Err.. pciconf -lv ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0:0: class=0x05 card=0x151115d9 chip=0x036910de
rev=0xa2 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Nvidia Corp'
device = 'MCP55 Memory Controller'
class = memory
subclass = RAM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:1:0: class=0x060100 card=0x151115d9 c
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
My next "router" appliance will be:
http://www.axiomtek.com.tw/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
This is exactly the device that I have been testing with (just rebranded).
Steve
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Dear Steve,
My next "router" appliance will be:
http://www.axiomtek.com.tw/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
This is exactly the device that I have been testing with (just rebranded).
cool.
what performace do you reach?
Kind regards,
Ingo Flaschberger
__
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Dear Steve,
My next "router" appliance will be:
http://www.axiomtek.com.tw/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
This is exactly the device that I have been testing with (just
rebranded).
cool.
what performace do you reach?
It's hard to say right now as I've really o
For your information we have mesured 730Kpps using pollng and
fastforwarding
with 64bits frame without loss (<0.001% packet loss) on a Spirent
Smarbits (Pentium D 2.8GHZ + 8xGig em)
You can find the code / and some performance report at :
http://www.netasq.com/opensource/pollng-rev1-freebsd.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 01:10:09PM +0300, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to reply to myself.
>
> Stefan Lambrev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May be a stupid questions, but:
>>
>> 1) There are zero matches of IFCAP_TOE in kernel sources .. there is not
>> support for TOE in 7.0, but may be this i
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kian Mohageri wrote:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>>
Johan Ström wrote:
> drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
Dear Steve,
My next "router" appliance will be:
http://www.axiomtek.com.tw/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
This is exactly the device that I have been testing with (just
rebranded).
cool.
what performace do you reach?
After some very quick testing with everythi
Dear Steve,
My next "router" appliance will be:
http://www.axiomtek.com.tw/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429
This is exactly the device that I have been testing with (just rebranded).
cool.
what performace do you reach?
After some very quick testing with everything default, I am witnessing
> Possibly, I'm seeing packet leakage from the switches and that is
> confusing FreeBSD - definitely the first packet above should not be
> visible.
Even if the switch broadcasts on all ports (effectively
becoming a hub) that should not cause the symptom you are
seeing. If the switch sent arp res
I have a real poser, and I ccan't solve it.
Currently I have a ipsec vpn tunneling 14 servers through a central server.
Like this:
| |
|___|
|
Opteron UP mode, no polling
input (em0) output
packets errs bytespackets errs bytes colls
1071020 0 66403248 2 0404 0
1049793 0 65087174 2 0356 0
1040320 0 64499848
On Mon, 26 May 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
In the continuing campaign to eliminate the Giant lock from the dregs of the
network stack, I thought I'd send out a list of non-MPSAFE netisr handlers:
LocationHandler Removed with IFF_NEEDSGIANT
dev/usb/usb_ethersubr.c
At 03:15 PM 7/3/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a real poser, and I ccan't solve it.
Currently I have a ipsec vpn tunneling 14 servers through a central server.
I would like to restructure this so that each server talks to each other
directly, rather than passing everything through a sing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no such packet (for .26) in your tcpdump output.
I spotted this:
> > 21:28:30.320445 00:0b:cd:d6:66:26 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype
> > 802.1Q (0x8100), length 64: vlan 169, p 0, ethertype ARP,
Synopsis: [gre] kernel crash when using gre
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 4 02:57:25 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=125239
_
I'm running into an issue where nd6_rtr.c:pfxlist_onlink_check() is possibly
not doing the right thing by marking a prefix as not ONLINK - I've noticed this
behavior in both FreeBSD 6 and 7.
I have an interface (say fxp0) which has an router-advertised address for
access outside the local subne
Numbers are maximum with near 100% cpu usage and some errors occuring,
just for testing.
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #6: Thu Jul 3 19:32:38 CDT
2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER amd64
CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor (3015.47-MHz K8-class CPU)
NON-S
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Paul wrote:
Numbers are maximum with near 100% cpu usage and some errors occuring, just
for testing.
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #6: Thu Jul 3 19:32:38 CDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER amd64
CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor (3
30 matches
Mail list logo
