On Saturday 21 June 2008 02:19:40 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > Now the problem no longer appears, even with "net.inet.udp.checksum=1".
> Thanks > for answering this so promptly, hopefuly the re(4) driver can be
> fixed to > avoid this kind of problem (or the -rxcsum -txcsum added
> automatically for
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Peter Kirk wrote:
On Saturday 21 June 2008 02:19:40 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Now the problem no longer appears, even with "net.inet.udp.checksum=1".
Thanks > for answering this so promptly, hopefuly the re(4) driver can be
fixed to > avoid this kind of problem (or the -rxcs
Synopsis: [ate] [patch] Promiscuous mode of if_ate (arm) doesn't work
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->freebsd-arm
Responsible-Changed-By: gavin
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jun 21 13:10:35 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to -arm@ mailing list for consideration
http://www.freebs
On Jun 20, 2008, at 8:38 AM, Diego Salvador wrote:
Hi,
Is there any difference in handling packet queues with ALTQ if the
network card is
a Gigabit fiber network interface and a Gigabit Ethernet network
interface with the
same driver? For example (em) driver for Intel-based cards. I'm
cu
Jack Vogel wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Support (Rudy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
... can you switch and run the interface in non-polled, in fact if
possible using
MSI??
At 5pm yesterday, I disabled polling. I've had about the same frequency of
'timeouts'
Jun 2
