Re: about DNS server

2008-04-16 Thread Steve Bertrand
Edwin Sanjoto wrote: Hi Guyz, I want to gain access to the internet via IPv4 (with the public IP) as my Gateway and I am using pure IPv6 (not dual stack)... I just want to know how to make a DNS server in freeBSD so i can gain access to the internet via IPv4... I've never used the faith dri

Re: A query regarding SCTP congestion control

2008-04-16 Thread Randall Stewart
Rahman, Md Sazzadur wrote: Hi, I would like to get the values of SCTP congestion control algorithm variables (cwnd, ssthresh, flightsize and pba) from any SCTP based application in runtime for research purpose. Does any API exist in SCTP for that? Do I need to dig the SCTP code in kernel to get

Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)

2008-04-16 Thread Randall Stewart
Vadim: Sorry I have not chimed in earlier.. I tend to "not look" often at some of my boxes :-) Glad Michael helped out here .. thanks Michael Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi Michael Tuexen! On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:34:13 +0100; Michael Tuexen wrote about 'Re: SCTP using questions (API etc.)': "s

bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Alexander Sack
Hello: Sorry for cross posting but this seems to be both a driver and network/kernel issue so I figure I actually thought all lists seemed appropriate. I'm investigating an issue we are seeing with 6.1-RELEASE and the bge driver dropping packets sporadically at 100MBps speed. The machine is a 2-

Re: bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Dieter
> I'm investigating an issue we are seeing with 6.1-RELEASE and the bge > driver dropping packets sporadically at 100MBps speed. > Its get mainly aggravated when heavy disk I/O occurs > Has anyone seen this problem before with bge? Am I barking up the > wrong tree with my initial investigation?

Re: bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Alexander Sack
Dieter: Thanks, at 20Mbps! That's pretty aweful. JK: Thanks again. Wow, I searched the list and didn't see much discussion with respect to bge and packet loss! I will try the rest of that patch including pushing the TCP receive buffer up (though I don't think that's going to help in this case)

Re: bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Jung-uk Kim
[CC trimmed] On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:20 pm, Alexander Sack wrote: > Dieter: Thanks, at 20Mbps! That's pretty aweful. > > JK: Thanks again. Wow, I searched the list and didn't see much > discussion with respect to bge and packet loss! I will try the > rest of that patch including pushing

[patch] ng_iface(4) and ports/net/mpd4 allow renaming of interfaces.

2008-04-16 Thread Ermal Luçi
Hello, the patches inlined give the ng_iface(4) and the mpd4 port the ability to rename its interfaces. IE if you create a new pppoe connection instead of the line new -i ng0 pppoe pppoe you can enter new -i pppoe0 pppoe pppoe so when mpd starts it will create an ngX interface with a ngX: hook a

Re: bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [CC trimmed] > > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:20 pm, Alexander Sack wrote: > > Dieter: Thanks, at 20Mbps! That's pretty aweful. > > > > JK: Thanks again. Wow, I searched the list and didn't see much > > discussion

Re: bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 04:28 pm, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [CC trimmed] > > > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:20 pm, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > Dieter: Thanks, at 20Mbps! That's pretty aweful. > > > > > > JK: Than

Re: bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 04:28 pm, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > [CC trimmed] > > > > > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 02:20 pm, Alexander Sack

Re: bge dropping packets issue

2008-04-16 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 05:02 pm, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 04:28 pm, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Jung-uk Kim > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > >

[bfe] [panic] Serious error: bfe failed to map RX buffer

2008-04-16 Thread quad
Hi, FreeBSD amd64 7.0-RELEASE, ULE, SMP. On heavy loads bfe network driver after few messages Serious error: bfe failed to map RX buffer Serious error: bfe failed to map RX buffer Serious error: bfe failed to map RX buffer ... make kernel panic. Here patch. -- Best

Re: amd64/122780: [lagg] tcpdump on lagg interface during high pps wedges netcode

2008-04-16 Thread Paul
The following reply was made to PR amd64/122780; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/122780: [lagg] tcpdump on lagg interface during high pps wedges netcode Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:40:53 -0400 It seems to

Re: [bfe] [panic] Serious error: bfe failed to map RX buffer

2008-04-16 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:43:53AM +0300, quad wrote: > Hi, > >FreeBSD amd64 7.0-RELEASE, ULE, SMP. > >On heavy loads bfe network driver after few messages > >Serious error: bfe failed to map RX buffer >Serious error: bfe failed to map RX buffer >Serious error: bfe f

Planned contrib/rdma import

2008-04-16 Thread Kip Macy
I plan on committing the generic kernel level rdma verb and iwarp infrastructure from OFED as well as the Chelsio iwarp driver to HEAD next week. The RDMA infrastructure doesn't require any kernel changes so I don't foresee any need for a lengthy discussion. For the most part this does not include

addition to ipfw table..

2008-04-16 Thread Julian Elischer
this change allows one to type ipfw table 2 add 1.1.1.1:255.255.255.0 0 in addition to the currently acceptable 1.1.1.1/24 0 The reason is that some programs supply the netmask in that (mask) form and a shell script trying to add it to a table has a hard time converting it to the currently accep

Re: Planned contrib/rdma import

2008-04-16 Thread Kip Macy
I received the following question in a private e-mail that I think others might be asking. > what is RDMA and ipwarp ? google didn't help much here :( RDMA in general is the ability to directly DMA to and from the memory of a remote host. In this particular context it is the ability to do so wit

Re: kern/122839: [multicast] FreeBSD 7 multicast routing problem

2008-04-16 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: FreeBSD 7 multicast routing problem New Synopsis: [multicast] FreeBSD 7 multicast routing problem Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Apr 17 05:45:46 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer

Lots of FIN_WAIT_1 TCP Connections and deadlock in zoneli state

2008-04-16 Thread Lin Jui-Nan Eric
Hi All, I am running squid as reverse proxy on FreeBSD 7.0-R amd64. After running for a while (~ 8 hours), the throughput degrades to very very low rate. I found the squid is in "zoneli" state and is already a bug report on http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106317 But after more investig

Re: addition to ipfw table..

2008-04-16 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Julian Elischer wrote: I do know it won't handle non contiguous masks well but as the ipfw ABI code only accepts a network mask length instead of a mask, there's not much that can be done. I may suggest a later fix for that but it will break the ABI. comments? What you think about my patch? -