MPLS and Google SoC

Hi All, My name is Ryan French. I am a uni student at Waikato University in New Zealand. This year I will be porting the Ayame project (an implementation of the MPLS networking stack) to FreeBSD as part of my course. I was wondering if there was anyone out there wanting to be a mentor for me

Re: MPLS and Google SoC

Please check even NetBSD tech mailing list since there has been posted an updated patch of ayame implementation for netbsd. This might help you since it fixed some bugs on ayame and has some more discussions on the remainings one. Regards Ermal Luçi IT Projects & Development Raiffeisen Bank of

Re: MPLS and Google SoC

Ryan French wrote: Hi All, My name is Ryan French. I am a uni student at Waikato University in New Zealand. This year I will be porting the Ayame project (an implementation of the MPLS networking stack) to FreeBSD as part of my course. I was wondering if there was anyone out there wanting to

Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)

Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:49:34AM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > I have replaced patch-ospfd_packet.c with the new one, > > and OSPF packets can find their way through again now. Unfortunately, > > the behavior is the same as with openospfd 4.0; it converges with > > right costs etc., but with th

PF firewall NAT and Windows IPSEC tunnel

Howdy folks. I have several computers behind a FreeBSD router (NAT 192.168.0.x using OpenBSD's PF) . One of those computers is a Windows machine which is using software called "Cisco Systems VPN Client" to connect to some other computers outside of our internal network. Our FreeBSD router's conn

Re: PF firewall NAT and Windows IPSEC tunnel

Hi-- On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Nerius Landys wrote: Howdy folks. I have several computers behind a FreeBSD router (NAT 192.168.0.x using OpenBSD's PF) . One of those computers is a Windows machine which is using software called "Cisco Systems VPN Client" to connect to some other computer

RE: PF firewall NAT and Windows IPSEC tunnel

list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 2876 (20080214) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http:/

KAME IPsec spd_delete2 bug ...

All, There is a bug in /usr/src/sys/netipsec/key.c in FreeBSD KAME IPsec sources. If an spd_delete2 message is submitted for an invalid policy id, the kernel crashes. Can someone please commit this trivial patch? I'm afraid its against 6.2 sources but its also only one line. Thanks, -Matthe

RE: PF firewall NAT and Windows IPSEC tunnel

Nerius, This sounds like a DPD timeout. The Cisco VPN client or Cisco gateway is probably not configured to use NAT-T or you are blocking UDP port 4500. Using the static-port trick will help in some instances where a client doesn't support NAT-T, but it also prevents multiple clients behind th