Oskar Eyb wrote:
Andre Oppermann schrieb am 03.02.2008 10:26:
85.214.42.62 is the other MTA, 172.16.0.2 is my jail.
I use PF with rdr/nat on FreeBSD 7 RC4.
We have not released 7RC4 yet. You probably run BETA4. An upgrade to
7RC1 or 7RC2 in the next few days fixes all known TCP bugs.
Yeah
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work
s kern/39937 netipstealth
I 'd like to learn what are the basic differences ( pros and cons ) between
the
FreeBSD network stack and the other OSs' ( especially linux )
I know that linux has had everything rewritten from scratch as far as the
implementation of tcp-ip and the sockets are concerned and would like to
know if
# ipfw pipe show | wc -l
sorry this should be:
ipfw pipe show | awk '$2 == "ip"' | wc -l
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Oskar Eyb wrote:
Andre Oppermann schrieb am 03.02.2008 10:26:
85.214.42.62 is the other MTA, 172.16.0.2 is my jail.
I use PF with rdr/nat on FreeBSD 7 RC4.
We have not released 7RC4 yet. You probably run BETA4. An upgrade to
7RC1 or 7RC2 in the next few days fixes al
* ithilgore -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080204 06:59] wrote:
> I 'd like to learn what are the basic differences ( pros and cons ) between
> the
> FreeBSD network stack and the other OSs' ( especially linux )
>
> I know that linux has had everything rewritten from scratch as far as the
> implementati
lysergius2001 wrote:
Hi
Recently installed AMD64 6.3-stable and I am having a problem with
devfs.conf and /dev. I understand the entries in devfs.conf should modify
the permissions on devices in /dev. For some reason or other this is not
happening. Can anyone shed some light on this? What am
ithilgore wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* ithilgore -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080204 06:59] wrote:
I 'd like to learn what are the basic differences ( pros and cons )
between
the
FreeBSD network stack and the other OSs' ( especially linux )
I know that linux has had everything rewritten fro
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* ithilgore -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080204 06:59] wrote:
I 'd like to learn what are the basic differences ( pros and cons ) between
the
FreeBSD network stack and the other OSs' ( especially linux )
I know that linux has had everything rewritten from scratch as far a
Synopsis: [panic] gnugk causes kernel panic when closing UDP sockets
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 5 02:09:50 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cg
UNCLASSIFIED
It would be good if we could first attack the issue of "sysctl -w
vfs.nfs.nfs_ip_paranoia=0 doesn't work even though mount_nfs -c does" as
then my FreeBSD clients could just set the sysctl and everything would
work.
With the situation as is, UDP NFS mounts have to be avoided which
The following reply was made to PR kern/116837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/116837: [tun] [panic] [patch] ifconfig tunX destroy: panic
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:58:31 +090
The following reply was made to PR kern/116837; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bob Van Zant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/116837: [tun] [panic] [patch] ifconfig tunX destroy: panic
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:04:08 +0530
I've been running this patch for the
Synopsis: double fault in freebsd 7.0
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 5 06:32:56 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
>From the backtrace this appears to be something in the networking code
(as far as I am able to
14 matches
Mail list logo
