On Jan 14, 2008 8:35 AM, Lyle Scott III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am experimenting more to make a small captive (wifi) portal system.
>
> I would like to use pf. I have been looking into authpf and it is a pretty
> good fit for what i need... but the users won't be SSHing to get allowed.
>
>
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
f kern/115360 net[ipv6] IPv6 address and if_bridge don't play well toge
1 problem total.
Serious problems
S Tracker
Hi,
I have just started experimenting with OpenLLDP and come across a little
bit of a nasty. When it opens the interface, it puts it into PROMISC
mode, which I don't really want to happen. Is there any way to add the
LLDP MAC address (01-80-C2-00-00-0E) to the interface mac filter from
use
Upgrade:
1) Added IPv6 Support (need to be tested)
Cheers
Raffaele
Hi,
i added a native (client) Socks V4/V5 support inside FreeBSD libc
library. The work is based of my project (see
http://csocks.altervista.org) CSOCKS.
You can get it here:
http://csocks.altervista.org/download/Fr
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I have just started experimenting with OpenLLDP and come across a
little bit of a nasty. When it opens the interface, it puts it into
PROMISC mode, which I don't really want to happen. Is there any way
to add the LLDP MAC address (01-80-C2-00-00-0E) to the interface ma
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I have just started experimenting with OpenLLDP and come across a
little bit of a nasty. When it opens the interface, it puts it into
PROMISC mode, which I don't really want to happen. Is there any way
to add the LLDP MAC address (01-80-C2-00-0
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:02:34PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 1:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Synopsis: [bge] bge(4) transmit performance problem
> >
> > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
> > Responsible-Changed-By: remko
> > Responsible-Changed-Wh
Tom Judge wrote:
Thanks for the response. I have a quick grep of the src tree to find
an example of this being used and only found the following from
wpa_supplicant and I have a few questions:
* I am presuming that this will do what I want, am I correct?
Yes, it will attempt to add the
Tom Judge wrote:
Ok, so if I can safely assume that the process sending/receiving the
LLDP frames should always be running would it be safe to use a helper
program to add the mac on system startup so it is always registered on
particular interfaces for the uptime of the system rather than hav
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Thanks for the response. I have a quick grep of the src tree to find
an example of this being used and only found the following from
wpa_supplicant and I have a few questions:
* I am presuming that this will do what I want, am I correct?
Yes, it
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:13:22 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
>I think I have finally given up on cisco.
>
>What are folks recommendations for a machine doing full bgp routes?
>
>I think I need to get a Sangoma card; but what is the current favorite
I am not sure the card is still s
On Jan 15, 2008 12:07 AM, Laurent Frigault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:02:34PM +0800, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 1:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Synopsis: [bge] bge(4) transmit performance problem
> > >
> > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebs
Hello,
a recent article
(http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-scalability/?ca=dgr-lnxw02FasterLinuxNet)
gives some measurements on various tweakings of an SMP machine with 4 Xeon
processors (it *shows* a nice improvement when using more CPUs and more
bonded Ethernet interfaces).
13 matches
Mail list logo
