Re: kern/117043: [em] Intel PWLA8492MT Dual-Port Network adapter EEPROM Checksum is Not Valid

2008-01-10 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
The following reply was made to PR kern/117043; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Wishmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kern/117043: [em] Intel PWLA8492MT Dual-Port Network adapter EEPROM Checksum is Not Valid Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2

Re: Coordinating TCP projects

2008-01-10 Thread Andre Oppermann
Lawrence Stewart wrote: Hi Andre, Andre Oppermann wrote: Lawrence Stewart wrote: [snip] Jim and I recently discussed the idea of implementing autotuning of the TCP reassembly queue size based on analysis of some experimental work we've been doing. It's a small project, but we feel it would

Re: Coordinating TCP projects

2008-01-10 Thread Randall Stewart
Robert: One thing I would like to point out for one of Lawrence's project is that SCTP is also hanging around in the kernel and as part of one of our URP's (which is also where Lawrence's project came from.. if I remember right)... we added "selectable" congestion control to SCTP.. well it was no

[PATCH] [bin/119542] netstat prints incorrectly host routes on bridge interfaces

2008-01-10 Thread Niki Denev
Hi, As mentioned in the PR : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/119542 netstat needs a little fix to print correctly host routes on bridge interfaces. The attached patch in the PR and here fixes the problem. Regards, Niki --- usr.bin/netstat/route.c.orig 2008-01-11 04:14:54.0

Re: Network device driver KPI/ABI and TOE

2008-01-10 Thread Kip Macy
On Jan 10, 2008 2:50 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:47:24 + (GMT), > rwatson wrote: > > > > > > There's also the opportunity to think about whether it's possible to > > harden things in such a ways as to not give up our flexibility to > > keep maintaining and improving

Re: Network device driver KPI/ABI and TOE

2008-01-10 Thread gnn
At Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:47:24 + (GMT), rwatson wrote: > > > There's also the opportunity to think about whether it's possible to > harden things in such a ways as to not give up our flexibility to > keep maintaining and improving TCP (and other related subsystems), > yet improving the quality o

Transport layer congestion control ideas (was Re: Coordinating TCP projects)

2008-01-10 Thread Lawrence Stewart
Hi Randall, Comments inline... Randall Stewart wrote: Robert: One thing I would like to point out for one of Lawrence's project is that SCTP is also hanging around in the kernel and as part of one of our URP's (which is also where Lawrence's project came from.. if I remember right)... we added

Re: Coordinating TCP projects

2008-01-10 Thread Andre Oppermann
Lawrence Stewart wrote: I've got a rewritten and much more efficient tcp_reass() function in my local tree. I'll import it into Perforce next week with all the other stuff. You may want to base your auto-sizing work on it. The only missing parts are some statistics gathering. Where abouts is

Re: kern/119548: [pf] [ath] PF Altq with ath hostap problem

2008-01-10 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: PF Altq with ath hostap problem New Synopsis: [pf] [ath] PF Altq with ath hostap problem Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jan 11 02:22:26 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: Assign to -net mailing list