Re: Text for IPv6 Scope

2008-01-05 Thread Michael Tuexen
Dear all, aren't site-local IPv6 addresses depreceated (RFC 3879)? So shouldn't the site-local stuff be removed? Best regards Michael On Jan 4, 2008, at 10:56 PM, Crist J. Clark wrote: Anyone up for adding text to the scopeid field in the ifconfig(8) output for IPv6 addresses? Other OSes do.

Re: Text for IPv6 Scope

2008-01-05 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Crist J. Clark wrote: Anyone up for adding text to the scopeid field in the ifconfig(8) output for IPv6 addresses? Other OSes do. To avoid too much disruption to the current format, the text is appended after the currently printed hexadecimal field. Example: fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 op

Re: if_ral regression

2008-01-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This actually brings up two things: > 1) I think we should ignore seq in multicast frames; this is permitted in > 802.11 standard. In dfly I did that, since one of our users > encountered a broken commercial AP which is not 802.11e but uses > differ

Re: Text for IPv6 Scope

2008-01-05 Thread Michael Smith
Hello All: I think we're crossing the streams here. The Site Local (FEC0::/10) has been deprecated. The fe80:: is Link Local and is very much alive. Regards, Mike On Jan 5, 2008, at 3:52 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: Dear all, aren't site-local IPv6 addresses depreceated (RFC 3879)? So sho

looking for dual-phy (copper & fiber) NIC

2008-01-05 Thread Aaron Turner
Sorry for the slightly OT, but I've run out of ideas... I could of sworn about a month ago or so, I found a half-height gigabit NIC (PCI Express I think) which offered two copper AND two SFP connectors for fiber. The card had only two ethernet controllers (Marvell I think), hence you could only

Re: resend: multiple routing table roadmap (format fix)

2008-01-05 Thread Vadim Goncharov
04.01.08 @ 00:52 Julian Elischer wrote: By the way, I might add that in the 6.x compat. version I may end up limiting the feature to 8 tables. This is because I need to store some stuff in an efficient way in the mbuf, and in a compatible manner this is easiest done by stealing the top 4 bits

ipsec_tools will not compile after IPSEC_NAT_T patch

2008-01-05 Thread Lyle Scott III
I applied the IPSEC_NAT_T patch from http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/patch-natt-freebsd6-2007-05-31.diff to FreeBSD 6.2-release-p9 yesterday to include IPSEC_NAT_T support. i did a make buildworld buildkernel && make installworld installkernel && shutdown -r now Now when i recompile /usr/ports/secur

Re: resend: multiple routing table roadmap (format fix)

2008-01-05 Thread Julian Elischer
Vadim Goncharov wrote: 04.01.08 @ 00:52 Julian Elischer wrote: By the way, I might add that in the 6.x compat. version I may end up limiting the feature to 8 tables. This is because I need to store some stuff in an efficient way in the mbuf, and in a compatible manner this is easiest done by s

Re: looking for dual-phy (copper & fiber) NIC

2008-01-05 Thread Nash Nipples
Dear Aaron, i give up on searching for a Dual-phy copper fiber gigabit nic. the search terminates at this 2004 article http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Ixia+Introduces+Dual-PHY+Copper%2FFiber-Optic+Gigabit+Ethernet+Testing...-a0112895579 assumption would be that Allied Telesis have made a successfull

Re: looking for dual-phy (copper & fiber) NIC

2008-01-05 Thread Kevin Day
On Jan 5, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Aaron Turner wrote: Sorry for the slightly OT, but I've run out of ideas... I could of sworn about a month ago or so, I found a half-height gigabit NIC (PCI Express I think) which offered two copper AND two SFP connectors for fiber. The card had only two ethernet

Re: Text for IPv6 Scope

2008-01-05 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:39:21AM -0800, Michael Smith wrote: > Hello All: > > I think we're crossing the streams here. The Site Local (FEC0::/10) > has been deprecated. The fe80:: is Link Local and is very much alive. Those are all of the scope values still assigned in RFC4291 which is the