Re: resend: multiple routing table roadmap (format fix)

2007-12-28 Thread gnn
At Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:26:11 -0800, julian wrote: > > Resending as my mailer made a dog's breakfast of the first one > with all sorts of wierd line breaks... hopefully this will be better. > (I haven't sent it yet so I'm hoping).. > > > --- > > > > On t

Re: resend: multiple routing table roadmap (format fix)

2007-12-28 Thread Ivo Vachkov
On Dec 27, 2007 11:19 PM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ivo Vachkov wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2007 2:26 AM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Resending as my mailer made a dog's breakfast of the first one > >> with all sorts of wierd line breaks... hopefully this will be

Re: resend: multiple routing table roadmap (format fix)

2007-12-28 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:26:11 -0800, julian wrote: [...] How does this work with Marko Zec's virtual stack system? Best, George orthogonal ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f

Re: resend: multiple routing table roadmap (format fix)

2007-12-28 Thread Marko Zec
On Friday 28 December 2007 14:49:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:26:11 -0800, > > julian wrote: > > > > On thing where FreeBSD has been falling behind, and which by chance > > I have some time to work on is "policy based routing", which allows > > different packet streams to be

Re: [Fwd: Re: rtfree: 0xc5caad98 has 2 refs]

2007-12-28 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Stefan Lambrev wrote: Hi, Can you replace all calls to rtfree() with RTFREE_LOCKED() in those files: netinet/if_ether.c netinet6/nd6_nbr.c netinet6/in6_ifattach.c netinet6/in6_gif.c Of course do not forget net/route.c with the patch from the PR. Recompile the kernel and check if this will cure

Re: Routing SMP benefit

2007-12-28 Thread Tiffany Snyder
Hi Andre, are those numbers for small (64 bytes) packets? Good job on pushing the base numbers higher on the same HW. What piqued my attention was the note that our forwarding performance doesn't scale with multiple CPUs. Which means there's a lot of work to be done :-) Have we tak

[patch] ICMP unreach, frag needed but df set + ro mtu broken

2007-12-28 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
Hi, while looking at an entirely different problems I found that icmp unreach, frag needed but df set does not take into account any route mtu in ip_forward breaking pmtu. I put a patch here: http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/patch-20071228-02-ip-forward-unreach-needfrag-ro.diff

Re: resend: multiple routing table roadmap (format fix)

2007-12-28 Thread gnn
At Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:40:30 +0100, Marko Zec wrote: > The thrust behind Julian's work seems to be providing multiple > forwarding tables for for purposes of traffic engineering / policy > based routing, with a single firewall instance used as a classifier. > vimage-style network stack virtuali