Re: ath wep confusion

2007-12-16 Thread Randy Bush
> ifconfig_ath0="channel 4 ssid rgnet-aden wep wepkey 13-characters > mediaopt hostap up" ! thank you. also needed to tell winxp that it was private security not enterprise. randy ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: ath wep confusion

2007-12-16 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Randy Bush wrote: > > ifconfig_ath0="channel 4 ssid rgnet-aden wep wepkey 13-characters > > mediaopt hostap up" > > ! thank you. Now I'm confused. Isn't that what you already had? > also needed to tell winxp that it was private security not enterprise. Ahah.

Re: ath wep confusion

2007-12-16 Thread Randy Bush
Ian Smith wrote: >>> ifconfig_ath0="channel 4 ssid rgnet-aden wep wepkey 13-characters >>> mediaopt hostap up" >> ! thank you. >> ^deftxkey 1 randy ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: ath wep confusion

2007-12-16 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007, Randy Bush wrote: > Ian Smith wrote: > >>> ifconfig_ath0="channel 4 ssid rgnet-aden wep wepkey 13-characters > >>> mediaopt hostap up" > >> ! thank you. > >> ^deftxkey 1 'k <%^}= _

Re: Spurious error from i[pf]_carp

2007-12-16 Thread Tom Judge
Bruce M. Simpson wrote: Max Laier wrote: Alternatively you could change IPPROTO_CARP in netinet/in.h to another unused protocol number. This is really the preferred way of dealing with mixed CARP and VRRP environments as the CARP packets might in turn irritate the VRRP routers, too. This

Re: is carp on if_bridge possible?

2007-12-16 Thread Niki Denev
On Dec 14, 2007 12:37 PM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2007 5:31 AM, Bruce M. Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Niki Denev wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Is this possible? > > > I've tried adding IFT_BRIDGE next to IFT_ETHER and IFT_L2VLAN in ip_carp.c > > > but th

Re: is carp on if_bridge possible?

2007-12-16 Thread Han Hwei Woo
Hi Niki, I hope I'm understanding you correctly, but the reason you're running if_lag is so that failover will occur even if there is a switch failure? If you enable preempt by setting: sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt=1, and you have a carp running on the routers' interface that goes through the

Re: is carp on if_bridge possible?

2007-12-16 Thread Niki Denev
On Dec 16, 2007 4:03 PM, Han Hwei Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Niki, > > I hope I'm understanding you correctly, but the reason you're running > if_lag is so that failover will occur even if there is a switch failure? > > If you enable preempt by setting: sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt=1,

Re: kern/118722: [tcp] Many old TCP connections in SYN_RCVD state

2007-12-16 Thread linimon
Synopsis: [tcp] Many old TCP connections in SYN_RCVD state Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 17 04:22:33 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Reassign to -net. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118722 __

Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-16 Thread Mark Fullmer
While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot dated November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly degrade network performance every 30.99 seconds. Packets appear to make it as