Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Bruce, I haven't heard back from you on this. can you please comment?
I'd like to add the policy to the header.
I'm not 100% happy with this suggestion, however, it is a loosely
working compromise.
I would be happier if the static index dependency on AF_MAX is ir
Gloomy Group wrote:
Hi all,
I am running Freebsd 6.2 as Transparent proxy Server. My hardware is
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz, 1GB DDR2 Memory and 2 SATA hardisk. While
checking dmesg it shows link state change to up and Down and sometimes the
server crashes.
ipfw: pullup failed
ipfw
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 19:11, Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
> As far as I'm seeing it now, this only happens when 2 users try to be
> simultaneously connected.
Just an assumption...
Do by any chance these two clients are behind
the same NAT device? Something like this?
Client_a Client_b
|
Definetly a bug... let me dig in a bit further.. it
appears that ASCONF is not happening on sub-set bound
sockets at all ;-(
I will see if I can figure out why :-D
R
sazzadur rahman wrote:
Hello,
I am using sctp patch for freebsd6.1. For dynamic address configuration, I
am calling sctp_bindx()
sazzadur rahman wrote:
Hello,
I am using sctp patch for freebsd6.1. For dynamic address configuration, I
am calling sctp_bindx() API after successfull bind() and connect() API's.
Although sctp_bindx() API successfully returns 0, the debug message shows:
addr_mgmt_assoc: added to pending list...
Hi,
After many years of good services we will stop using FreeBSD 4.x :)
During my performance regression tests under FreeBSD 6.2 i've found
that polling has lower performance than interrupt.
To solve that issue i've rewritten the core of polling to be more SMP
ready.
You can find a
Well I spoke to soon.. after a bit more testing .. I figured
out that I had fat-fingered my address set on my
second interface.. opps :-D
So after testing I see this all working now on the latest
code.. now as I said the Jul_13 issue is way behind.. so
I have now updated the sctp.org web site wit
Randall Stewart wrote:
> sazzadur rahman wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I am using sctp patch for freebsd6.1. For dynamic address
>> configuration, I
>> am calling sctp_bindx() API after successfull bind() and connect() API's.
>> Although sctp_bindx() API successfully returns 0, the debug message
>> shows:
>>
We are in the stage of planning and research for a commercial development of an
edge router that will be based mostly on OpenSource software. I would like to
solicit for information and recommendation if FreeBSD is a suitable OS. The
router is expected to withstand forwarding of sustained traffi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, I got hit by an attack, but haven't been able to easily determine whom
was being attacked ...
I run ipaudit to monitor bandwidth usage, so I have 'source / destination'
information, but I'm not finding any particularly easy way to narrow dow
On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:48 PMSep 6, 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, I got hit by an attack, but haven't been able to easily
determine whom
was being attacked ...
I run ipaudit to monitor bandwidth usage, so I have 'source /
destination'
inf
* Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070906 21:28]:
>
> Is there either a command line command, or ports tool, that I can use similar
> to top, or systat -iostat, that will help identify the IP that is being
> attacked?
In some way, you could also use wireshark:
http://www.wireshark.org/
Ol
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
I'm using MPD4 to establish a PPTP VPN from my FreeBSD 6.2 server to
some clients and I've started encountering some strange problems.
The connection goes well, everything functions accordingly but after
a while (very random, can be 5 minutes
On Thursday 06 September 2007 14:59:36 Olivier Brisson wrote:
> * Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070906 21:28]:
> > Is there either a command line command, or ports tool, that I can use
> > similar to top, or systat -iostat, that will help identify the IP that is
> > being attacked?
>
> In s
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Is there either a command line command, or ports tool, that I can use similar
> to top, or systat -iostat, that will help identify the IP that is being
> attacked?
>
I've found net-mgmt/iftop to be very usefull in the past.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Today, I got hit by an attack, but haven't been able to easily determine whom
> was being attacked ...
>
> I run ipaudit to monitor bandwidth usage, so I have 'source / dest
* Kirc Gover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070906 11:10] wrote:
> We are in the stage of planning and research for a commercial development of
> an edge router that will be based mostly on OpenSource software. I would like
> to solicit for information and recommendation if FreeBSD is a suitable OS.
> Th
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070821 14:13] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to reserve about 64 entries for VENDOR specific address
> families in sys/socket.h.
>
> I think this will allow vendors to comfortably use the array of
> address families without worrying about overlap with
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:06:54AM +1000, Kirc Gover wrote:
> We are in the stage of planning and research for a commercial development of
> an edge router that will be based mostly on OpenSource software. I would like
> to solicit for information and recommendation if FreeBSD is a suitable OS.
On 9/6/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok which clever person did this again?
>
> It just broke our product.
> If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
Talk to Sam. I think we added a flag for LRO, may want something more general.
-Kip
___
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On 9/6/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Today, I got hit by an attack, but haven't been able to easily determine whom
> was being attacked ...
>
> I run ipaudit to monitor bandwidth usage, so I have 'source / destination'
> info
PRESS RELEASE
Subsidy directory 2007 (Legal Deposit-National-Library)
The 2007 edition is now available.
A guide containing more than 3200 programs from:
Federal & provincial governments, as
On 9/6/07, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. I've already said (multiple times): nuke the code.
Oops - faulty memory - brain too small.
-Kip
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
Kip Macy wrote:
On 9/6/07, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just about to be...
Talk to Sam. I think we added a flag for LRO, may want something more general
David Christensen wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ok which clever person did this again?
It just broke our product.
If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just
about to be...
on the topic above, I've found that the bce driver seems to
be throwingaway packets
larger than the mtu
I have tested by changing Cable and Switch too but doesnot seem to solve
problem. May be it;s due to NIC card, it's inbuilt Intel fxp0 card.
> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:17:09 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Interface Status cha
Hi,
Wesley Griffin wrote:
but I get the following output:
-
Current value 0x0013 will change to 0x0010
Retrying eeprom write!
Retrying eeprom write!
[snip lots of this message]
EEPROM write failed
this sounds like a simple hardware error.
Or does your device have a write protection?
In
I have purchased a D-Link DWL-AG530 PCI NIC for my gateway and am
attempting to get it working with RELENG_6_2 but am having problems
and could use some help please.
First, I'm using 6.2-RELEASE-p7. Relevant (I've attached the full
/var/run/dmesg.boot) dmesg output:
ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Ok which clever person did this again?
> >
> > It just broke our product.
> > If it hasn't been removed from 7.0 and 6.x yet it's just
> about to be...
>
>
> on the topic above, I've found that the bce driver seems to
> be throwingaway packets
> larger than the mtu
31 matches
Mail list logo
