Re: 6.2 mtu now limits size of incomming packet

2007-07-22 Thread Artyom Viklenko
Stephen Clark wrote: Artyom Viklenko wrote: Artem Belevich wrote: Here's one example where MTU!=MRU would be useful. Think of asymmetric bandwith-limited ADSL links. Lower MTU would allow lower TX latency for high priority packets when upstream is saturated, yet large MRU on the downstream

Policy-based routing for packets originating from local machine ('reinject' packets back into kernel?)

2007-07-22 Thread m_wlist
Hello. I have a FreeBSD machine connected to internal network and several ISPs. I have set up (with pf) nat and balanced (policy-based) routing for machines from internal network, proper routing for remote connections to interfaces that connected to corresponding ISPs. One thing that I can't mana

Call for testers: multicast forwarding

2007-07-22 Thread Bruce M Simpson
Hi, I may have some commercial work coming up which requires me to make modifications to the IPv4 multicast forwarding code in Linux. It is likely I will prototype the work in FreeBSD. It will probably not be released publicly. To prepare for this I have started cleaning up the MROUTING code

Re: Policy-based routing for packets originating from local machine ('reinject' packets back into kernel?)

2007-07-22 Thread Milan Obuch
On Sunday 22 July 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello. > ... > > At the moment I'm trying to get that working with netgraph's ngeth > interfaces. But they seem to behave in some really weird way. > Details: > # ifconfig ngeth0 10.42.42.1 netmask 255.255.255.250 Netmask 255.255.255.250 looks wei

Re: 6.2 mtu now limits size of incomming packet

2007-07-22 Thread Sten Daniel Soersdal
Mike Karels wrote: Any two hosts, connected to single Layer2 network MUST use same MTU. Any other cases lead to hard-to-solve problems. I'd have to disagree. In fact, I'd say that any two hosts on the same L2 network must use the same MRU. In particular, if a host choses to use a lower MTU, i

Re: Policy-based routing for packets originating from local machine ('reinject' packets back into kernel?)

2007-07-22 Thread m_wlist
> On Sunday 22 July 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> At the moment I'm trying to get that working with netgraph's ngeth >> interfaces. But they seem to behave in some really weird way. >> Details: >> # ifconfig ngeth0 10.42.42.1 netmask 255.255.255.250 > > Netmask 255.255.255.250 looks weird to me

Re: Policy-based routing for packets originating from local machine ('reinject' packets back into kernel?)

2007-07-22 Thread Sten Daniel Soersdal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I have a FreeBSD machine connected to internal network and several ISPs. I have set up (with pf) nat and balanced (policy-based) routing for machines from internal network, proper routing for remote connections to interfaces that connected to corresponding ISPs.